header-logo header-logo

06 September 2007
Issue: 7287 / Categories: Legal News , EU , Discrimination , Employment
printer mail-detail

65 AND OUT

In brief

The Heyday ageism case which challenges mandatory retirement ages has been referred to the European Court of Justice (ECJ) for a preliminary ruling. The High Court has referred five questions to the ECJ which address whether parts of the Employment Equality (Age) Regulations 2006 (SI 2006/2408) properly implement the EU Equal Treatment Directive 76/207/EC. Heyday and Age Concern believe the new rules breach the Directive because they leave people over 65 without the right to choose to continue to work and enable employers to refuse to recruit anyone over the age of 65.

Issue: 7287 / Categories: Legal News , EU , Discrimination , Employment
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Charles Russell Speechlys—James Paterson

Charles Russell Speechlys—James Paterson

Charles Russell Speechlys further bolsters Private Equity expertise with the appointment of James Paterson

Ellisons—Samuel Flower

Ellisons—Samuel Flower

Ellisons strengthens Rural Affairs team with senior appointment

Sidley—Carl Hotton

Sidley—Carl Hotton

Sidley adds insurance mergers and acquisitions partner to London office

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll