header-logo header-logo

A biomechanical future for family lawyers?

12 February 2020
Categories: Legal News , Family
printer mail-detail
Family lawyers of the future may have to grapple with complex ethical questions concerning parental disputes where a child’s genetic makeup is manipulated at conception to produce socially desirable characteristics, a family judge has predicted

Giving the keynote address at the Four Jurisdictions Family Law Conference this week, Mr Justice McDonald made some predictions for legal issues in the next 25 years.

He said lawyers are ‘already seeing new categories of maltreatment emerge’, the most recent example of which is the systematic exploitation of children by criminal gangs. Future parental disputes could involve biomechanical modifications and biotechnical interfaces for humankind.

‘Will screen time become a welfare issue? We might also contemplate whether the emergence and acceptance of entirely self-driving vehicles will see the end of disputes as to who supervises the handover of children as between separated parents.’

Ultimately, however, he predicted the ‘best interests of the child’ test, in the Children Act 1989, would retain its value.

‘On their face, disputes between parents as to whether to allow their child the addition of a biotechnical interface to supplement the child’s memory capacity… appear new and exotic to us. But the essential question remains the same. Namely, which of the diverging choices advanced by the parents as a legitimate exercise of their parental responsibility is in the child’s best interests, having regard to the child’s wishes and feelings, characteristics, physical, emotional and educational needs, any risk of harm, the capabilities of the parents and the powers of the court.

‘The best interests test and, in my jurisdiction, the welfare checklist constitute supremely malleable tools, sufficiently flexible to last us long into the future.’

Categories: Legal News , Family
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Private client division announces five new partners

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Banking and finance team welcomes partner in London

NEWS
The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings
Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?
Lord Sales has been appointed to become the Deputy President of the Supreme Court after Lord Hodge retires at the end of the year
Limited liability partnerships (LLPs) are reportedly in the firing line in Chancellor Rachel Reeves upcoming Autumn budget
back-to-top-scroll