header-logo header-logo

A biomechanical future for family lawyers?

12 February 2020
Categories: Legal News , Family
printer mail-detail
Family lawyers of the future may have to grapple with complex ethical questions concerning parental disputes where a child’s genetic makeup is manipulated at conception to produce socially desirable characteristics, a family judge has predicted

Giving the keynote address at the Four Jurisdictions Family Law Conference this week, Mr Justice McDonald made some predictions for legal issues in the next 25 years.

He said lawyers are ‘already seeing new categories of maltreatment emerge’, the most recent example of which is the systematic exploitation of children by criminal gangs. Future parental disputes could involve biomechanical modifications and biotechnical interfaces for humankind.

‘Will screen time become a welfare issue? We might also contemplate whether the emergence and acceptance of entirely self-driving vehicles will see the end of disputes as to who supervises the handover of children as between separated parents.’

Ultimately, however, he predicted the ‘best interests of the child’ test, in the Children Act 1989, would retain its value.

‘On their face, disputes between parents as to whether to allow their child the addition of a biotechnical interface to supplement the child’s memory capacity… appear new and exotic to us. But the essential question remains the same. Namely, which of the diverging choices advanced by the parents as a legitimate exercise of their parental responsibility is in the child’s best interests, having regard to the child’s wishes and feelings, characteristics, physical, emotional and educational needs, any risk of harm, the capabilities of the parents and the powers of the court.

‘The best interests test and, in my jurisdiction, the welfare checklist constitute supremely malleable tools, sufficiently flexible to last us long into the future.’

Categories: Legal News , Family
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—Ed Williams

DWF—Ed Williams

Public sector disputes capability bolstered by partner hire in Leeds

Blake Morgan—Scott Hilton, Joan Yu & Melia Hirst

Blake Morgan—Scott Hilton, Joan Yu & Melia Hirst

Firm strengthens corporate, real estate and insolvency teams with partner trio

Seddons GSC—David Seal & Emma Clifford

Seddons GSC—David Seal & Emma Clifford

Consultant and solicitor join commercial real estate team

NEWS
Judging is ‘more intellectually demanding than any other role in public life’—and far messier than outsiders imagine. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC reflects on decades spent wrestling with unclear legislation, fragile precedent and human fallibility
The long-predicted death of the billable hour may finally be here—and this time, it’s armed with a scythe. In a sweeping critique of time-based billing, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, argues in this week's NLJ that artificial intelligence has made hourly charging ‘intellectually, commercially and ethically indefensible’
From fake authorities to rent reform, the civil courts have had a busy start to 2026. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold surveys a procedural landscape where guidance, discretion and discipline are all under strain
Fact-finding hearings remain a fault line in private family law. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Rylatt and Robyn Laye of Anthony Gold Solicitors analyse recent appeals exposing the dangers of rushed or fragmented findings
As the Winter Olympics open in Milan and Cortina, legal disputes are once again being resolved almost as fast as the athletes compete. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Ian Blackshaw of Valloni Attorneys examines the Court of Arbitration for Sport’s (CAS's) ad hoc divisions, which can decide cases within 24 hours
back-to-top-scroll