header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
01 April 2022 / Daniel Martin , Anita Clifford , Michael Goodwin KC
Issue: 7973 / Categories: Features , Criminal
printer mail-detail

A leap forward in corporate liability: failure to prevent economic crime offence

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
77183
  • Looks at mounting support for the introduction of a failure to prevent economic crime offence.
  • It would represent a considerable expansion on the ‘identification doctrine’.
  • Would the broad scope of the new offence be matched by an increase in resources at the Serious Fraud Office?

Recent events in Ukraine and growing concern, both in government and among the general public, about illicit wealth in the UK have significantly increased the likelihood of a new failure to prevent economic crime offence being introduced. If this much talked about development does happen, then the offence poses big implications for businesses in all sectors.

The legislation

The new Economic Crime (Transparency and Enforcement) Act received Royal Assent in the early hours of 15 March 2022, following an unusually rapid passage through Parliament. This new Act does not contain provisions for a failure to prevent offence and focuses instead on the introduction of a new register requiring anonymous owners of UK property

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Harper James—Lottie Hugo

Harper James—Lottie Hugo

Commercial law firm announces appointment of corporate partner

Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Partner joins corporate and finance practice in British Virgin Islands

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Firm strengthens children department with adoption and surrogacy expert

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Your magistrates’ court needs you!
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
LexisNexis Legal Awards 2026—the winners!
The winners of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2026 have now been announced, marking another outstanding celebration of excellence, innovation, and impact across the legal profession
NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll