header-logo header-logo

27 March 2026 / Fred Philpott
Issue: 8155 / Categories: Opinion , Limitation
printer mail-detail

A limitation revolution?

245642
Fred Philpott on how the Supreme Court has transformed the existing law as to limitations

Before 1623, there were no statutory limitation periods. A land ‘owner’ could not be certain that their occupancy of the land could not be challenged by someone alleging that they had better title because of events going back very many decades, if not more. This instability and economic uncertainty in land ownership which was at the centre of the country’s economic system had to be dealt with, and resulted in the first Limitation Act in 1623. The detailed history of this legislation, and an extensive review of other common law jurisdictions, is set out at [41] to [109] in the recent Supreme Court judgment of THG plc v Zedra Trust Company (Jersey) Ltd [2026] UKSC 6. This decision is a good example of what the Supreme Court can produce that has much wider ramifications than the instant case.

Limitations are not an esoteric area of law. The subject is essential to the proper administration of civil justice (and

To access this full article please fill the form below.
All fields are mandatory unless marked as 'Optional'.
If you already a subscriber to New Law Journal, please login here

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Winckworth Sherwood—Charlotte Coleman & Qaisar Sheikh

Winckworth Sherwood—Charlotte Coleman & Qaisar Sheikh

Two promoted to partner in property litigation and education teams

Dorsey & Whitney LLP—Peter Knust

Dorsey & Whitney LLP—Peter Knust

Cross-border finance and restructuring specialist joins as of counsel in London

Powell Gilbert—Callum Beamish-Lacey

Powell Gilbert—Callum Beamish-Lacey

IP firm promotes litigator to partnership

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll