header-logo header-logo

A matter of fact(s): fact-finding hearings in private children proceedings

22 July 2020 / Kim Beatson , Victoria Rylatt
Issue: 7896 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail
24635
Fact-finding hearings in private children proceedings: an overview, by Kim Beatson & Victoria Brown
  • A fact-finding hearing: a court makes findings of fact on issues identified by the parties or the court.
  • Domestic abuse and definitions: encompassing, but not limited to, psychological, physical, sexual, financial, or emotional abuse.
  • The burden of proof: on the party making the allegation.
  • Evidence and practical issues: statutory guidance.
  • Following a FFH: the best interests of a child.
  • Appealing findings of fact: notoriously difficult.

A ‘fact-finding hearing’ (FFH) is the first limb of a split hearing which is a hearing divided in to two parts. In the first half the court makes findings of fact on issues identified by the parties or the court and recorded in a Scott Schedule (precedents available from us if needed). During the second part the court decides the case based on the findings.

Often there will be a clear and stark issue such as sexual or serious physical

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll