header-logo header-logo

19 January 2024 / Caroline Shea KC , Tim Rothwell
Issue: 8055 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

A new species of ‘without notice’ injunction

153988
Caroline Shea KC & Thomas Rothwell consider the Supreme Court’s latest guidance on injunctions binding newcomers
  • In Wolverhampton City Council v London Gypsies and Travellers & Ors [2023] UKSC 47, the Supreme Court confirmed the existence of the equitable power to grant injunctions binding newcomers as a species of ‘without notice’ injunction.
  • Such injunctions will remain an exceptional remedy. While the court gave general guidance as to when such orders will be appropriate, it remains to be seen how this will be applied in the lower courts.

Picture the scene: a well-known business becomes the target of protesters because of its associations with, say, the oil industry. Those protests become unruly and give rise to acts of trespass, nuisance and harassment. An injunction is sought (and obtained) restraining persons unknown from persisting with such acts. Can that injunction bind ‘newcomers’, as yet a formless mass, who later decide to join the protest?

This was the question of principle considered by the Supreme Court in Wolverhampton

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

JMW—Belinda Brooke

JMW—Belinda Brooke

Employment and people solutions offering boosted by partner hire

NEWS

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law
back-to-top-scroll