header-logo header-logo

19 January 2024 / Caroline Shea KC , Tim Rothwell
Issue: 8055 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

A new species of ‘without notice’ injunction

153988
Caroline Shea KC & Thomas Rothwell consider the Supreme Court’s latest guidance on injunctions binding newcomers
  • In Wolverhampton City Council v London Gypsies and Travellers & Ors [2023] UKSC 47, the Supreme Court confirmed the existence of the equitable power to grant injunctions binding newcomers as a species of ‘without notice’ injunction.
  • Such injunctions will remain an exceptional remedy. While the court gave general guidance as to when such orders will be appropriate, it remains to be seen how this will be applied in the lower courts.

Picture the scene: a well-known business becomes the target of protesters because of its associations with, say, the oil industry. Those protests become unruly and give rise to acts of trespass, nuisance and harassment. An injunction is sought (and obtained) restraining persons unknown from persisting with such acts. Can that injunction bind ‘newcomers’, as yet a formless mass, who later decide to join the protest?

This was the question of principle considered by the Supreme Court in Wolverhampton

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll