header-logo header-logo

A new species of ‘without notice’ injunction

19 January 2024 / Caroline Shea KC , Tim Rothwell
Issue: 8055 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail
153988
Caroline Shea KC & Thomas Rothwell consider the Supreme Court’s latest guidance on injunctions binding newcomers
  • In Wolverhampton City Council v London Gypsies and Travellers & Ors [2023] UKSC 47, the Supreme Court confirmed the existence of the equitable power to grant injunctions binding newcomers as a species of ‘without notice’ injunction.
  • Such injunctions will remain an exceptional remedy. While the court gave general guidance as to when such orders will be appropriate, it remains to be seen how this will be applied in the lower courts.

Picture the scene: a well-known business becomes the target of protesters because of its associations with, say, the oil industry. Those protests become unruly and give rise to acts of trespass, nuisance and harassment. An injunction is sought (and obtained) restraining persons unknown from persisting with such acts. Can that injunction bind ‘newcomers’, as yet a formless mass, who later decide to join the protest?

This was the question of principle considered by the Supreme Court in Wolverhampton City

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Kadie Bennett, Anthony Collins

NLJ Career Profile: Kadie Bennett, Anthony Collins

Kadie Bennett, senior associate at Anthony Collins and chair of the Resolution West Midlands Group, discusses her long-standing passion for family law and calls for unity in the profession

Osborne Clarke—Lara Burch

Osborne Clarke—Lara Burch

Firm appoints new UK senior partner for 2026

Keoghs—Louise Jackson & Katie Everson

Keoghs—Louise Jackson & Katie Everson

Healthcare and sports legal team expands in the north west

NEWS
Lawyers and users of the business and property courts are invited to share their views on disclosure, in particular the operation of PD 57AD and the use of Technology Assisted Review (TAR) and artificial intelligence (AI)
Social media giants should face tortious liability for the psychological harms their platforms inflict, argues Harry Lambert of Outer Temple Chambers in this week’s NLJ
The Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024—once heralded as a breakthrough—has instead plunged leaseholders into confusion, warns Shabnam Ali-Khan of Russell-Cooke in this week’s NLJ
The Employment Appeal Tribunal has now confirmed that offering a disabled employee a trial period in an alternative role can itself be a 'reasonable adjustment' under the Equality Act 2010: in this week's NLJ, Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve analyses the evolving case law
Caroline Shea KC and Richard Miller of Falcon Chambers examine the growing judicial focus on 'cynical breach' in restrictive covenant cases, in this week's issue of NLJ
back-to-top-scroll