header-logo header-logo

19 January 2024 / Caroline Shea KC , Tim Rothwell
Issue: 8055 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

A new species of ‘without notice’ injunction

153988
Caroline Shea KC & Thomas Rothwell consider the Supreme Court’s latest guidance on injunctions binding newcomers
  • In Wolverhampton City Council v London Gypsies and Travellers & Ors [2023] UKSC 47, the Supreme Court confirmed the existence of the equitable power to grant injunctions binding newcomers as a species of ‘without notice’ injunction.
  • Such injunctions will remain an exceptional remedy. While the court gave general guidance as to when such orders will be appropriate, it remains to be seen how this will be applied in the lower courts.

Picture the scene: a well-known business becomes the target of protesters because of its associations with, say, the oil industry. Those protests become unruly and give rise to acts of trespass, nuisance and harassment. An injunction is sought (and obtained) restraining persons unknown from persisting with such acts. Can that injunction bind ‘newcomers’, as yet a formless mass, who later decide to join the protest?

This was the question of principle considered by the Supreme Court in Wolverhampton

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll