header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
12 July 2024 / Georgina Squire , Camilla Pratt
Issue: 8079 / Categories: Features , Profession , ADR , Mediation
printer mail-detail

A seismic shift in approach to mediation

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
181418
Mandatory ADR is here to stay, write Georgina Squire & Camilla Pratt
  • In Churchill, the Court of Appeal set new standards for court-ordered mediation, allowing a stay of proceedings in some situations.
  • The Civil Procedure Rules Committee is currently looking at a CPR rule change to reflect Churchill and give the courts greater powers to force parties to mediate their disputes.

There have been many discussions on the topic of mandatory alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and it seems to be an issue that is here to stay, with the courts moving further towards compelling parties to mediate. This is particularly relevant in light of the increasing costs of legal proceedings and proportionality concerns being at the forefront of the judiciary’s mind. We see regularly at costs management conferences the courts’ desire to look for ways to reduce costs. They are also battling with an ever-present backlog and concerns about wasted resources in the civil justice system in England and Wales.

The Civil Justice Council addresses

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

Fieldfisher partner appointed president as LSLA marks milestone year

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Firm promotes two lawyers to partnership across employment and family

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Firm promotes five lawyers to partnership across key growth areas

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Your magistrates’ court needs you!
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
NLJ this week: Clarity on whistleblowing, settlements and tribunal limits
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll