header-logo header-logo

12 July 2024 / Georgina Squire , Camilla Pratt
Issue: 8079 / Categories: Features , Profession , ADR , Mediation
printer mail-detail

A seismic shift in approach to mediation

181418
Mandatory ADR is here to stay, write Georgina Squire & Camilla Pratt
  • In Churchill, the Court of Appeal set new standards for court-ordered mediation, allowing a stay of proceedings in some situations.
  • The Civil Procedure Rules Committee is currently looking at a CPR rule change to reflect Churchill and give the courts greater powers to force parties to mediate their disputes.

There have been many discussions on the topic of mandatory alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and it seems to be an issue that is here to stay, with the courts moving further towards compelling parties to mediate. This is particularly relevant in light of the increasing costs of legal proceedings and proportionality concerns being at the forefront of the judiciary’s mind. We see regularly at costs management conferences the courts’ desire to look for ways to reduce costs. They are also battling with an ever-present backlog and concerns about wasted resources in the civil justice system in England and Wales.

The Civil Justice Council addresses

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll