header-logo header-logo

29 July 2020 / Alec Samuels
Issue: 7897 / Categories: Features , In court , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

A Supreme review & a constitutional revolution

Alec Samuels details a decade of the UK Supreme Court

In brief

  • Independence and identity.
  • Constitutional, public law and human rights issues.
  • A separation of powers.

The creation of the UK Supreme Court a decade or so ago was a constitutional revolution. The judges left the House of Lords. They obtained their own building. They look to be a new institution. They are now called justices. They are no longer peers, but knighted, appointed to the Privy Council, and given the courtesy title of Lord or Lady. How is the institution working?

Independence

The Supreme Court has developed a strong sense of independence and identity, sitting in its own building in Parliament Square, virtually running its own affairs, managing its own budget, appointing the chief executive who determines the staffing, making its own rules, and controlling its own docket, about 70 cases a year. Modern technology is used to the full. The justices and counsel are unrobed. The proceedings are transparent, and televised, and oral and

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll