header-logo header-logo

A Supreme review & a constitutional revolution

29 July 2020 / Alec Samuels
Issue: 7897 / Categories: Features , In court , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail
Alec Samuels details a decade of the UK Supreme Court

In brief

  • Independence and identity.
  • Constitutional, public law and human rights issues.
  • A separation of powers.

The creation of the UK Supreme Court a decade or so ago was a constitutional revolution. The judges left the House of Lords. They obtained their own building. They look to be a new institution. They are now called justices. They are no longer peers, but knighted, appointed to the Privy Council, and given the courtesy title of Lord or Lady. How is the institution working?

Independence

The Supreme Court has developed a strong sense of independence and identity, sitting in its own building in Parliament Square, virtually running its own affairs, managing its own budget, appointing the chief executive who determines the staffing, making its own rules, and controlling its own docket, about 70 cases a year. Modern technology is used to the full. The justices and counsel are unrobed. The proceedings are transparent, and televised, and oral and

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hamlins—Maddox Legal

Hamlins—Maddox Legal

London firm announces acquisition of corporate team

Ward Hadaway—Nik Tunley

Ward Hadaway—Nik Tunley

Head of corporate appointed following Teesside merger

Taylor Rose—Russell Jarvis

Taylor Rose—Russell Jarvis

Firm expands into banking and finance sector with newly appointed head of banking

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll