header-logo header-logo

Abandon clinical negligence costs reforms, government told

27 April 2022
Issue: 7976 / Categories: Legal News , Personal injury
printer mail-detail
Proposed clinical negligence costs reforms are ‘unfair’ to injured patients and families of patients who have died, and would act as a barrier to access to justice, personal injury lawyers have warned

The Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) consultation, Fixed recoverable costs in lower value clinical negligence claims, closed this week. It proposed a streamlined process for claims valued up to £25,000, with limits at each stage on the amount of legal costs that successful claimants can recover.

Responding, the Association of Costs Lawyers (ACL) said the proposed pre-action track should go ahead as this would achieve the objective of reducing costs, but the plans for fixed recoverable should be dropped.

ACL Council member Kris Kilsby said: ‘Fixed recoverable costs are a very blunt instrument that may work in areas where the course of claims is relatively predictable―such as road traffic accidents―but not in a much more complex area like clinical negligence.’

If the government did decide to go ahead, however, the ACL questioned the level of costs and noted the consultation failed to provide ‘any form of reasoning’. It urged a ‘full and proper costs analysis’ before the final fixed recoverable costs were decided.

Qamar Anwar, managing director of independent legal marketing collective First4Lawyers, urged the government to ditch the whole plan, warning ‘low value does not mean simple’.

Moreover, the proposals could backfire, with litigants in person trying to being unmeritorious claims, costing the NHS more in legal spend. He said the government’s plans to introduce mandatory neutral evaluation, with specialist barristers evaluating claims at the outset, could lead to longer delays for consumers.

Suzanne Trask, Association of Personal Injury Lawyers (Apil) executive committee member, said: ‘Subjecting vulnerable injured patients, who lack the capacity to bring their own claims, to this pared down process is unfair and inconsistent.’
Issue: 7976 / Categories: Legal News , Personal injury
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Slater Heelis—Oliver Banks

Slater Heelis—Oliver Banks

Manchester firm strengthens Court of Protection expertise with partner hire

Talbots Law—Sara Pickerin & Nicholas Playford

Talbots Law—Sara Pickerin & Nicholas Playford

Agricultural law team expands with senior director appointments

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Firm announces appointment of chief legal officer

NEWS
The London Legal Support Trust (LLST) is calling on the legal community to don aprons and sharpen their pencils for two of its most popular fundraising events—the Great Legal Bake and the Great Legal Quiz. The events, which take place in November, raise vital funds for free legal advice charities across London and the South East
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has launched a review of its whiplash policies, including fixed tariffs, statutory definition of the injury, ban on settling cases without medical evidence and small claims limit
Family lawyers have welcomed government plans to repeal the presumption of parental involvement from the Children Act 1989, but emphasised the need for each case to be determined on its facts
Transferring anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorism financing supervision to the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) could create extra paperwork and increase costs for clients, lawyers have warned 
Defendant lawyers are ‘routinely dangling’ the prospect of a fundamental dishonesty argument ‘as a tactic to instil fear and to discourage’ claimants, the Association of Personal Injury Lawyers (APIL) has warned.
back-to-top-scroll