header-logo header-logo

14 July 2016 / Michael Zander KC
Issue: 7707 / Categories: Opinion , Brexit , EU
printer mail-detail

Act in haste…

nlj_7707_comment

If Brexit withdrawal cannot be reversed the UK is at risk of a seriously bad outcome, explains Michael Zander QC​

The discussion about triggering withdrawal from the EU has so far concentrated mainly on the question whether it requires Parliamentary approval. Little attention has yet been given to an even more troubling question—if withdrawal is started, could it be withdrawn mid-process?

A possible reason for wanting to withdraw might be so serious a downturn in the UK’s overall economic position as to persuade the government that Brexit should not after all go ahead. A completely different reason would be realisation that the terms for withdrawal on offer from the EU were completely unacceptable, or worse, that withdrawal was about to take place without terms having been agreed.

The issue is explored by Jonathan Rickford, former legal academic and senior legal civil servant and Robert (Bob) Ayling, former legal civil servant and CEO of BA (“Brexit Referendum and Article 50 of the Treaty on European Union: A Legal Trap: the Need for Legislation”).

Once

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

42BR Barristers—4 Brick Court

42BR Barristers—4 Brick Court

42BR Barristers to be joined by leading family law set, 4 Brick Court, this summer

Winckworth Sherwood—Rubianka Winspear

Winckworth Sherwood—Rubianka Winspear

Real estate and construction energy offering boosted by partner hire

Gateley Legal—Daniel Walsh

Gateley Legal—Daniel Walsh

Firm bolsters real estate team with partner hire in Birmingham

NEWS
A wave of housing and procedural reforms is set to test the limits of tribunal capacity. In his latest Civil Way column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold charts sweeping change as the Renters’ Rights Act 2025 begins biting
Plans to reduce jury trials risk missing the real problem in the criminal justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, David Wolchover of Ridgeway Chambers argues the crown court backlog is fuelled not by juries but weak cases slipping through a flawed ‘50%’ prosecution test
Emerging technologies may soon transform how courts determine truth in deeply personal disputes. In this week's NLJ, Madhavi Kabra of 1 Hare Court and Harry Lambert of Outer Temple Chambers explore how neurotechnology could reshape family law
A controversial protest case has reignited debate over the limits of free expression. In NLJ this week, Nicholas Dobson examines a Quran-burning incident testing public order law
The courts have drawn a firm line under attempts to extend arbitration appeals. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed of the University of Leicester highlights that if the High Court refuses permission under s 68 of the Arbitration Act 1996, that is the end
back-to-top-scroll