header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
16 September 2019 / Michael Zander KC
Issue: 7856 / Categories: Features , Brexit , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Acting up: will the government abide by the law?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Michael Zander QC traces the Benn Bill’s speedy progress to the statute book
  • The European Union (Withdrawal) (No 2) Act 2019.
  • Procedure was at the heart of the battle between the promoters of the Bill and its opponents.

The European Union (Withdrawal) (No 6) Bill was introduced by Hilary Benn (Labour MP for Leeds Central, pictured) at 3.13pm on Wednesday 4 September. It received Royal Assent on Monday 9 September at 3.18pm.

From ‘No 6 Bill‘, it became ‘No 2 Act’—because it was the second Act with that name to be passed in 2019. The first, the so-called Cooper-Letwin Bill, which also was rushed through all its stages in April, required the then prime minister, Theresa May, to seek an Art 50 extension beyond 12 April 2019. In the event she ended by agreeing to an extension until 31 October. (See ‘Brexit: is MPs taking control a good or a bad thing?’ NLJ, 3 May 2019, p13).

The cross-party sponsors

The

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Firm strengthens global fund finance practice with London partner hire.

DWF—Stephen Webb

DWF—Stephen Webb

Partner and head of national planning team appointed

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

Corporate team expands in Birmingham with partner hire

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: When post-breach events rewrite damages claims
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
NLJ this week: Supreme Court redraws unfair prejudice rules
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
NLJ this week: ‘Joe Donor’ ruling exposes dangers of unregulated conception
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
NLJ this week: CILEX warns Mazur ruling must spark reform
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
NLJ this week: Conditional job offers carry hidden risks for employers
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll