header-logo header-logo

Action stations

08 July 2011 / Tom Walker
Issue: 7473 / Categories: Opinion , Terms&conditions , Employment
printer mail-detail

Tom Walker crosses the picket line to investigate the right to strike

Last week’s public sector strikes and the threat of further co-ordinated industrial action underline Unison leader Dave Prentice’s belief that his union is on a “collision course unless the government changes its policies”. Of course, these are not political strikes; despite the rhetoric, they are actions based on economic grievances. The government has proposed reforms to pension schemes across the public sector and there are threatened compulsory redundancies at the BBC. These are strikes in furtherance of a trade dispute and are protected actions because they follow an industrial rather than a political objective.

There is much disquiet at the likely wave of co-ordinated strikes, with calls for tougher legislation. We have seen the usual and understandable comments about the disruption to the lives of individuals caused when certain sectors take strike action. However, such inconvenience is not a reason for prohibiting strike action. While strikes in certain services such as the military and the police are illegal, these are exceptions to the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll