header-logo header-logo

Action stations

08 July 2011 / Tom Walker
Issue: 7473 / Categories: Opinion , Terms&conditions , Employment
printer mail-detail

Tom Walker crosses the picket line to investigate the right to strike

Last week’s public sector strikes and the threat of further co-ordinated industrial action underline Unison leader Dave Prentice’s belief that his union is on a “collision course unless the government changes its policies”. Of course, these are not political strikes; despite the rhetoric, they are actions based on economic grievances. The government has proposed reforms to pension schemes across the public sector and there are threatened compulsory redundancies at the BBC. These are strikes in furtherance of a trade dispute and are protected actions because they follow an industrial rather than a political objective.

There is much disquiet at the likely wave of co-ordinated strikes, with calls for tougher legislation. We have seen the usual and understandable comments about the disruption to the lives of individuals caused when certain sectors take strike action. However, such inconvenience is not a reason for prohibiting strike action. While strikes in certain services such as the military and the police are illegal, these are exceptions to the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll