header-logo header-logo

08 July 2011 / Tom Walker
Issue: 7473 / Categories: Opinion , Terms&conditions , Employment
printer mail-detail

Action stations

Tom Walker crosses the picket line to investigate the right to strike

Last week’s public sector strikes and the threat of further co-ordinated industrial action underline Unison leader Dave Prentice’s belief that his union is on a “collision course unless the government changes its policies”. Of course, these are not political strikes; despite the rhetoric, they are actions based on economic grievances. The government has proposed reforms to pension schemes across the public sector and there are threatened compulsory redundancies at the BBC. These are strikes in furtherance of a trade dispute and are protected actions because they follow an industrial rather than a political objective.

There is much disquiet at the likely wave of co-ordinated strikes, with calls for tougher legislation. We have seen the usual and understandable comments about the disruption to the lives of individuals caused when certain sectors take strike action. However, such inconvenience is not a reason for prohibiting strike action. While strikes in certain services such as the military and the police are illegal, these are exceptions to the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Construction team bolstered by hire of senior consultant duo

Switalskis—four appointments

Switalskis—four appointments

Firm expands residential conveyancing team with quadruple appointment

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

Private client team welcomes senior associatein Worcester

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll