header-logo header-logo

ADR: Just in time for Early Neutral Evaluation?

24 July 2020 / Suzanne Rab
Issue: 7896 / Categories: Features , Profession , ADR , Mediation
printer mail-detail
24104
Professor Suzanne Rab explains the pros & cons of Early Neutral Evaluation, & offers some practical advice
  • Gives practical advice on appointing an evaluator and other ENE matters.
  • The author has witnessed an increase in ENE in the context of COVID-19, which can be arranged quickly and conducted remotely.

Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) is a method of alternative dispute resolution (ADR). It is a flexible way to resolve disputes without the parties having to engage in full-scale litigation. Like other alternative dispute resolution (ADR) methods, including mediation, one of the main attractions of ENE is the flexibility it offers to resolve disputes at comparatively less cost and in a timely manner. It may also be conducted without a physical hearing. These factors have contributed to renewed interest in ENE as the social distancing and economic uncertainty connected with the pandemic continues to be felt.

What is ENE?

ENE has evolved to mean different things: first, a voluntary option and latterly a court-sanctioned process. It

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll