header-logo header-logo

05 July 2007 / Tanveer Qureshi
Issue: 7280 / Categories: Features , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Adverse publicity

It’s time to stop the hyperbolic reporting of terrorist cases, says Tanveer Qureshi

The right to a fair trial is guaranteed by Art 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights and lies at the heart of the English legal system. It encompasses several other rights—including the right to be presumed innocent until proven guilty—and, some would argue, demands that bias or prejudice for or against the accused, the witnesses, or the cause which is being tried, is eliminated.

However, the increasingly sensational way in which terrorist arrests and trials have been reported in the press, and the apparent reluctance of judges to intervene and prevent prejudicial reporting of cases, lends weight to the suggestion that Art 6 is becoming nothing more than a toothless provision.

DIRECTIONS TO JURIES

The fairness of the criminal trial process relies on the assumption that juries will try cases fairly, independent of anything they may see, hear, or read outside the courtroom. This assumption is crystallised by judicial directions. At the start of a trial and before deliberations begin,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
back-to-top-scroll