header-logo header-logo

Adverse publicity

05 July 2007 / Tanveer Qureshi
Issue: 7280 / Categories: Features , Human rights
printer mail-detail

It’s time to stop the hyperbolic reporting of terrorist cases, says Tanveer Qureshi

The right to a fair trial is guaranteed by Art 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights and lies at the heart of the English legal system. It encompasses several other rights—including the right to be presumed innocent until proven guilty—and, some would argue, demands that bias or prejudice for or against the accused, the witnesses, or the cause which is being tried, is eliminated.

However, the increasingly sensational way in which terrorist arrests and trials have been reported in the press, and the apparent reluctance of judges to intervene and prevent prejudicial reporting of cases, lends weight to the suggestion that Art 6 is becoming nothing more than a toothless provision.

DIRECTIONS TO JURIES

The fairness of the criminal trial process relies on the assumption that juries will try cases fairly, independent of anything they may see, hear, or read outside the courtroom. This assumption is crystallised by judicial directions. At the start of a trial and before deliberations begin,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll