header-logo header-logo

05 July 2007 / Tanveer Qureshi
Issue: 7280 / Categories: Features , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Adverse publicity

It’s time to stop the hyperbolic reporting of terrorist cases, says Tanveer Qureshi

The right to a fair trial is guaranteed by Art 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights and lies at the heart of the English legal system. It encompasses several other rights—including the right to be presumed innocent until proven guilty—and, some would argue, demands that bias or prejudice for or against the accused, the witnesses, or the cause which is being tried, is eliminated.

However, the increasingly sensational way in which terrorist arrests and trials have been reported in the press, and the apparent reluctance of judges to intervene and prevent prejudicial reporting of cases, lends weight to the suggestion that Art 6 is becoming nothing more than a toothless provision.

DIRECTIONS TO JURIES

The fairness of the criminal trial process relies on the assumption that juries will try cases fairly, independent of anything they may see, hear, or read outside the courtroom. This assumption is crystallised by judicial directions. At the start of a trial and before deliberations begin,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
back-to-top-scroll