header-logo header-logo

05 July 2007 / Tanveer Qureshi
Issue: 7280 / Categories: Features , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Adverse publicity

It’s time to stop the hyperbolic reporting of terrorist cases, says Tanveer Qureshi

The right to a fair trial is guaranteed by Art 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights and lies at the heart of the English legal system. It encompasses several other rights—including the right to be presumed innocent until proven guilty—and, some would argue, demands that bias or prejudice for or against the accused, the witnesses, or the cause which is being tried, is eliminated.

However, the increasingly sensational way in which terrorist arrests and trials have been reported in the press, and the apparent reluctance of judges to intervene and prevent prejudicial reporting of cases, lends weight to the suggestion that Art 6 is becoming nothing more than a toothless provision.

DIRECTIONS TO JURIES

The fairness of the criminal trial process relies on the assumption that juries will try cases fairly, independent of anything they may see, hear, or read outside the courtroom. This assumption is crystallised by judicial directions. At the start of a trial and before deliberations begin,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Investigations and corporate crime expert joins as partner

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Veteran funds specialist joins investment funds team

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Firm enhances competition practice with London partner hire

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll