header-logo header-logo

27 July 2017 / Charles Pigott
Issue: 7756 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Advocate General drops holiday pay bombshell

Could gig economy workers have a right to claim backdated holiday pay? Charles Pigott reports

  • Advocate General Tanchev has given an opinion which could open the way to substantial claims for backdated holiday pay from gig economy workers.
  • This new approach would provide an added incentive for employers to get their workers’ employment status right at the outset of the relationship.

The Advocate General’s opinion in King v the Sash Window Workshop C-214/16 would put the onus squarely on employers to provide an ‘adequate facility’ for the exercise of the right to take paid annual leave under the Working Time Directive 2003/88/EC (WTD).

The opinion was given on 8 June 2017, in response to a request for a reference from the Court of Appeal. That followed an appeal by Mr King from the decision of the Employment Appeal Tribunal [2015] IRLR 348. Mr King had been working as a commission only salesman since 1999. He had been categorised as self-employed, and had refused a new contract as an employee on different terms

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
back-to-top-scroll