header-logo header-logo

Age of consent?

01 October 2009 / Jacqueline Renton
Issue: 7387 / Categories: Features , Family , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Jacqueline Renton reports on the human rights’ approach to non-consensual marriage

Forced marriage is a fundamental violation of an individual’s human rights, namely the right to marry, pursuant to Art 12 of the European Convention on Human Rights (the Convention).

Women and men, young and old, healthy and disabled, are forced into marriage every year in this country.

Forced marriages are a breach of an individual’s human rights and also lead to a catalogue of other abuses of human rights—domestic violence, rape, genital mutilation and even murder—thus encompassing: Art 3 (prohibition on torture or inhumane or degrading treatment); Art 4 (prohibition on slavery or servitude and forced labour); Art 5 (right to liberty and security of person); Art 8 (right to respect for private and family life); and Art 17 (probation on abuse of rights).

With respect to murder, these “honour based” killings occur as a result of an individual “dishonouring” or “shaming” the family by refusing to marry the individual chosen for him/her or leaving the forced marriage for another, unsuitable individual.

A

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll