header-logo header-logo

Age of consent?

01 October 2009 / Jacqueline Renton
Issue: 7387 / Categories: Features , Family , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Jacqueline Renton reports on the human rights’ approach to non-consensual marriage

Forced marriage is a fundamental violation of an individual’s human rights, namely the right to marry, pursuant to Art 12 of the European Convention on Human Rights (the Convention).

Women and men, young and old, healthy and disabled, are forced into marriage every year in this country.

Forced marriages are a breach of an individual’s human rights and also lead to a catalogue of other abuses of human rights—domestic violence, rape, genital mutilation and even murder—thus encompassing: Art 3 (prohibition on torture or inhumane or degrading treatment); Art 4 (prohibition on slavery or servitude and forced labour); Art 5 (right to liberty and security of person); Art 8 (right to respect for private and family life); and Art 17 (probation on abuse of rights).

With respect to murder, these “honour based” killings occur as a result of an individual “dishonouring” or “shaming” the family by refusing to marry the individual chosen for him/her or leaving the forced marriage for another, unsuitable individual.

A

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll