header-logo header-logo

29 May 2008
Issue: 7323 / Categories: Legal News , Discrimination , Employment
printer mail-detail

Agency workers win equal treatment

News

Agency workers will be afforded equal treatment to their full-time counterparts after 12 weeks in a job, it has been announced, in a deal hammered out after six years of discussions between the government, the CBI and the TUC.

The agreement—which will see new agency worker rights outlined in legislation introduced during the next Parliamentary session—has been hailed as a victory by the TUC and the “least worst option” by the CBI. 
Natalie Black, employment lawyer at Thring Townsend Lee & Pembertons, says equal pay is likely to be a top priority. “While this may not be warmly welcomed by some employers, they can at least breathe a sigh of relief that various occupational benefits commensurate with long-term employment, such as sick pay and pension provision, have been excluded,” she says.

She adds that all parties must continue to work together to ensure that the competing needs of agency workers and employers are fairly reflected in the proposed legislation. “The balance is a fine one and the risk is that the new legislation will undermine a long-standing mutually beneficial relationship between agency workers and employers. Employers are also likely to consider that the agreement contradicts a recent judicial decision which found that the current status of an agency worker is a perfectly satisfactory one providing the tripartite relationships between the agency worker, the agency and its clients are sufficiently clear,” she adds.

Although the 12-week minimum period goes some way to preserving the flexibility that employers currently enjoy, she says, the TUC will have to fight hard to ensure that any anti-avoidance mechanisms, such as those preventing employers from engaging workers on repeated short term contracts, are given sufficient legislative force to enable their workers to reap the benefits of their new entitlements. 

Issue: 7323 / Categories: Legal News , Discrimination , Employment
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Projects and rail practices strengthened by director hire in London

DWF—Stephen Hickling

DWF—Stephen Hickling

Real estate team in Birmingham welcomes back returning partner

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Firm invests in national growth with 44 appointments across five offices

NEWS
Refusing ADR is risky—but not always fatal. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed and Sanjay Dave Singh of the University of Leicester analyse Assensus Ltd v Wirsol Energy Ltd: despite repeated invitations to mediate, the defendant stood firm, made a £100,000 Part 36 offer and was ultimately ‘wholly vindicated’ at trial
The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 transformed criminal justice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ed Cape of UWE and Matthew Hardcastle and Sandra Paul of Kingsley Napley trace its ‘seismic impact’
Operational resilience is no longer optional. Writing in NLJ this week, Emma Radmore and Michael Lewis of Womble Bond Dickinson explain how UK regulators expect firms to identify ‘important business services’ that could cause ‘intolerable levels of harm’ if disrupted
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
back-to-top-scroll