header-logo header-logo

29 May 2008
Issue: 7323 / Categories: Legal News , Discrimination , Employment
printer mail-detail

Agency workers win equal treatment

News

Agency workers will be afforded equal treatment to their full-time counterparts after 12 weeks in a job, it has been announced, in a deal hammered out after six years of discussions between the government, the CBI and the TUC.

The agreement—which will see new agency worker rights outlined in legislation introduced during the next Parliamentary session—has been hailed as a victory by the TUC and the “least worst option” by the CBI. 
Natalie Black, employment lawyer at Thring Townsend Lee & Pembertons, says equal pay is likely to be a top priority. “While this may not be warmly welcomed by some employers, they can at least breathe a sigh of relief that various occupational benefits commensurate with long-term employment, such as sick pay and pension provision, have been excluded,” she says.

She adds that all parties must continue to work together to ensure that the competing needs of agency workers and employers are fairly reflected in the proposed legislation. “The balance is a fine one and the risk is that the new legislation will undermine a long-standing mutually beneficial relationship between agency workers and employers. Employers are also likely to consider that the agreement contradicts a recent judicial decision which found that the current status of an agency worker is a perfectly satisfactory one providing the tripartite relationships between the agency worker, the agency and its clients are sufficiently clear,” she adds.

Although the 12-week minimum period goes some way to preserving the flexibility that employers currently enjoy, she says, the TUC will have to fight hard to ensure that any anti-avoidance mechanisms, such as those preventing employers from engaging workers on repeated short term contracts, are given sufficient legislative force to enable their workers to reap the benefits of their new entitlements. 

Issue: 7323 / Categories: Legal News , Discrimination , Employment
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Boodle Hatfield—Clare Pooley & Michael Duffy

Boodle Hatfield—Clare Pooley & Michael Duffy

Private wealth and real estate firmpromotes two to partner and five to senior associate

Forbes Solicitors—Stephen Barnfield

Forbes Solicitors—Stephen Barnfield

Regulatory team boosted by partner hire amid rising health and safety demand

Arc Pensions Law—Kris Weber

Arc Pensions Law—Kris Weber

Legal director promoted to partner at specialist pensions firm

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll