header-logo header-logo

29 May 2008
Issue: 7323 / Categories: Legal News , Discrimination , Employment
printer mail-detail

Agency workers win equal treatment

News

Agency workers will be afforded equal treatment to their full-time counterparts after 12 weeks in a job, it has been announced, in a deal hammered out after six years of discussions between the government, the CBI and the TUC.

The agreement—which will see new agency worker rights outlined in legislation introduced during the next Parliamentary session—has been hailed as a victory by the TUC and the “least worst option” by the CBI. 
Natalie Black, employment lawyer at Thring Townsend Lee & Pembertons, says equal pay is likely to be a top priority. “While this may not be warmly welcomed by some employers, they can at least breathe a sigh of relief that various occupational benefits commensurate with long-term employment, such as sick pay and pension provision, have been excluded,” she says.

She adds that all parties must continue to work together to ensure that the competing needs of agency workers and employers are fairly reflected in the proposed legislation. “The balance is a fine one and the risk is that the new legislation will undermine a long-standing mutually beneficial relationship between agency workers and employers. Employers are also likely to consider that the agreement contradicts a recent judicial decision which found that the current status of an agency worker is a perfectly satisfactory one providing the tripartite relationships between the agency worker, the agency and its clients are sufficiently clear,” she adds.

Although the 12-week minimum period goes some way to preserving the flexibility that employers currently enjoy, she says, the TUC will have to fight hard to ensure that any anti-avoidance mechanisms, such as those preventing employers from engaging workers on repeated short term contracts, are given sufficient legislative force to enable their workers to reap the benefits of their new entitlements. 

Issue: 7323 / Categories: Legal News , Discrimination , Employment
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

JMW—Belinda Brooke

JMW—Belinda Brooke

Employment and people solutions offering boosted by partner hire

NEWS

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law
back-to-top-scroll