header-logo header-logo

17 November 2023 / Charles Pigott
Issue: 8049 / Categories: Features , Employment , EU , Brexit
printer mail-detail

Agnew & retained EU law

146639
How is the EU law thread in Agnew to be applied to the rest of the UK? Charles Pigott reports
  • The Supreme Court has—at long last—clarified the meaning of the phrase “series of deductions” which is used to calculate the time limit for unlawful deductions claims across the whole of the UK.
  • However, the excision of the general principles of EU law from domestic law on 31 December 2023 could mean that other aspects of the ruling have a more limited shelf-life.

There are two distinct threads running through the Supreme Court’s decision in Chief Constable of the Police Service of Northern Ireland v Agnew [2023] UKSC 33, [2023] All ER (D) 14 (Oct). The first—deriving from the general principles of EU law—conferred on police officers in Northern Ireland the same rights to recover historical underpayments of holiday pay as their civilian colleagues. Once this parity had been established by reading additional words into the Working Time Regulations (Northern Ireland) 1998 (SI 1998/386), the Supreme Court turned to purely

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll