header-logo header-logo

AI & access to justice

226809
Frontline legal services have the most to gain from artificial intelligence, but also face unique challenges in its provision, write Emily Carter & Sahil Kher

The judgment of the Divisional Court in R (Ayinde) v London Borough of Haringey [2025] EWHC 1383 (Admin) has generated significant interest within the legal community. Although the court determined that the reliance upon ‘fake’ citations did not justify commencing contempt proceedings on the specific facts of these two cases, the court’s concern was clear. As Dame Victoria Sharp P said in her judgment: ‘There are serious implications for the administration of justice and public confidence in the justice system if artificial intelligence [AI] is misused.’

Although the headlines in the legal press about these cases have focused upon fake case citations, the risks posed by AI within litigation are much broader. Generative AI is now embedded in many publicly available search tools, as well as legal research platforms. Fake citations may be linked to fake judgments; inaccuracies in emphasis or

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll