header-logo header-logo

AI & access to justice

226809
Frontline legal services have the most to gain from artificial intelligence, but also face unique challenges in its provision, write Emily Carter & Sahil Kher

The judgment of the Divisional Court in R (Ayinde) v London Borough of Haringey [2025] EWHC 1383 (Admin) has generated significant interest within the legal community. Although the court determined that the reliance upon ‘fake’ citations did not justify commencing contempt proceedings on the specific facts of these two cases, the court’s concern was clear. As Dame Victoria Sharp P said in her judgment: ‘There are serious implications for the administration of justice and public confidence in the justice system if artificial intelligence [AI] is misused.’

Although the headlines in the legal press about these cases have focused upon fake case citations, the risks posed by AI within litigation are much broader. Generative AI is now embedded in many publicly available search tools, as well as legal research platforms. Fake citations may be linked to fake judgments; inaccuracies in emphasis or

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
back-to-top-scroll