header-logo header-logo

AI risk: cyber threat or reputational crisis?

246122
AI has transformed the nature of cyber threats & also widened their audience: Jess Chan weighs up systems failures & erosion of trust

Artificial intelligence (AI) is now embedded in mainstream legal work: research, disclosure, due diligence and drafting. The regulatory conversation has largely centred on competence, supervision and confidentiality. But a more subtle shift is underway.

AI is collapsing the traditional boundary between cyber risk and reputational risk. For law firms, that distinction matters. Cyber incidents were once largely technical events, handled by IT teams and insurers. Today, AI-driven threats have an immediate public dimension: they travel fast, they are difficult to rebut in real time, and they strike directly at a firm’s credibility.

The Solicitors Regulation Authority continues to publish scam alerts involving fake solicitors and cloned identities. In 2025, it warned of a fraudster using the name and image of a genuine partner to target members of the public. Such incidents do not necessarily originate within a firm’s own

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll