header-logo header-logo

27 February 2026 / Nicholas Dobson
Issue: 8151 / Categories: Features , Tort , Liability , Public
printer mail-detail

Ain’t misbehavin’?

243395
A recent case has provided a timely reminder of the key ingredients of the tort of misfeasance in public office: Nicholas Dobson reports
  • This article outlines the elements of the tort of misfeasance in public office, which the claimants failed to meet in Whiteway-Wilkinson and others v Revenue and Customs Commissioners.

Although Fats Waller sang that he ‘Ain’t misbehavin’, even if he had been, he wasn’t a public officer, and it was obvious from the song’s romantic context that there was no question of legal liability. However, for public authorities it may not always be so straightforward. For, depending upon the circumstances, misfeasance (the improper performance of a lawful act) by public bodies may, if it results in actionable damage, constitute the tort of misfeasance in public office (MPO). This is important for such organisations, for authorities always need to ascertain that their decisions are lawful, reasonable, consistent with fiduciary duty and taken for a proper, lawful public purpose. An intentional abuse of power, accompanied by subjective bad faith, causing claimant

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
The Environment Agency can prosecute offences beyond environmental legislation where proceedings support its statutory functions, the Divisional Court has confirmed
back-to-top-scroll