header-logo header-logo

Airline strikes: extraordinary circumstances?

25 February 2022
Issue: 7968 / Categories: Features , Aviation
printer mail-detail
73190
Lee Finch & Ann-Marie O’Neil examine the high threshold for determining which events are outside an airline’s control
  • Industrial action by an airline carrier’s employees touching on their conditions of employment did not amount to an ‘extraordinary circumstance’ for the purposes of Art 5(3) of Regulation (EC) 261/2004.
  • Where flights are cancelled as the result of such strikes, carriers are liable to pay compensation to the affected passengers.
  • Involved consideration of CJEU decisions which had been issued after the end of the implementation period.

Ryanair recognised unions for the first time in December 2017. Subsequently, unions in multiple jurisdictions commenced negotiations with Ryanair. The Irish union, Fórsa, made 11 demands in relation to the seniority structure among Irish pilots. Ryanair argued that these demands could not be satisfied as they would compromise its business model and ability to operate as a low-cost airline. As a result of the failed negotiations, pilots and cabin crew employed by Ryanair went on strike in July, August and September 2018.

The strike caused the cancellation of multiple Ryanair

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Partner appointed as head of residential conveyancing for England

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

Specialist firm enhances corporate healthcare practice with partner appointment

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll