header-logo header-logo

23 March 2012 / Martin Burns
Issue: 7506 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

All on board

Martin Burns tracks the rise & rise of dispute boards

Dispute boards are not a new phenomenon. They have been a feature of international construction contracts for decades and were first used in the US in the 1960s.

In 1968 a “joint consulting board” was set up for the Boundary Dam in Washington State. The idea behind the board was to have people imbedded throughout the lifetime of the project to make quick decisions the moment any sign of a conflict arose. This is the essential purpose of dispute boards today.

Rising popularity

In the 1970s, six major US tunnel projects used dispute boards, including the massive Colorado Eisenhower Tunnel. Their role was to manage relationships between key stakeholders who were involved in delivering the project and to make quick, non-binding, recommendations to the parties when conflicts arose.

Between 1986 and 2002, dispute boards were used on around 350 major civil projects in the US, worth a total of around $80bn—98% of disputes that surfaced on these projects were settled by dispute boards,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Slater Heelis—Probate & Court of Protection team

Slater Heelis—Probate & Court of Protection team

Slater Heelis brings Probate and Court of Protection expertise together with new dedicated team

Clarke Willmott—Antonia Power

Clarke Willmott—Antonia Power

Antonia Power joins Clarke Willmott in Taunton

Haynes Boone—Chris Acton

Haynes Boone—Chris Acton

Chris Acton joins Haynes Boone as chair of UK derivatives platform

NEWS
Civil practitioners face changes spanning debt recovery, workplace harassment and possession claims, alongside guidance on insolvency challenges and children proceedings

Finding matrimonial wealth is as challenging as dividing it, as family disputes draw practitioners into asset tracing, offshore structures and insolvency

Agreement between opponents offers no guarantee that a court will approve a retrospective increase to a costs budget
Climate change belongs on every lawyer’s agenda, with risks extending far beyond environmental practice into commercial advice, litigation and access to justice
Workplace bullying and harassment can no longer be left solely to HR, as financial regulation scrutinises culture, character and fitness
back-to-top-scroll