header-logo header-logo

All on board

23 March 2012 / Martin Burns
Issue: 7506 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Martin Burns tracks the rise & rise of dispute boards

Dispute boards are not a new phenomenon. They have been a feature of international construction contracts for decades and were first used in the US in the 1960s.

In 1968 a “joint consulting board” was set up for the Boundary Dam in Washington State. The idea behind the board was to have people imbedded throughout the lifetime of the project to make quick decisions the moment any sign of a conflict arose. This is the essential purpose of dispute boards today.

Rising popularity

In the 1970s, six major US tunnel projects used dispute boards, including the massive Colorado Eisenhower Tunnel. Their role was to manage relationships between key stakeholders who were involved in delivering the project and to make quick, non-binding, recommendations to the parties when conflicts arose.

Between 1986 and 2002, dispute boards were used on around 350 major civil projects in the US, worth a total of around $80bn—98% of disputes that surfaced on these projects were settled by dispute boards,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Writing in NLJ this week, Thomas Rothwell and Kavish Shah of Falcon Chambers unpack the surprise inclusion of a ban on upwards-only rent reviews in the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll