header-logo header-logo

All on board

23 March 2012 / Martin Burns
Issue: 7506 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Martin Burns tracks the rise & rise of dispute boards

Dispute boards are not a new phenomenon. They have been a feature of international construction contracts for decades and were first used in the US in the 1960s.

In 1968 a “joint consulting board” was set up for the Boundary Dam in Washington State. The idea behind the board was to have people imbedded throughout the lifetime of the project to make quick decisions the moment any sign of a conflict arose. This is the essential purpose of dispute boards today.

Rising popularity

In the 1970s, six major US tunnel projects used dispute boards, including the massive Colorado Eisenhower Tunnel. Their role was to manage relationships between key stakeholders who were involved in delivering the project and to make quick, non-binding, recommendations to the parties when conflicts arose.

Between 1986 and 2002, dispute boards were used on around 350 major civil projects in the US, worth a total of around $80bn—98% of disputes that surfaced on these projects were settled by dispute boards,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll