header-logo header-logo

All on board

23 March 2012 / Martin Burns
Issue: 7506 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Martin Burns tracks the rise & rise of dispute boards

Dispute boards are not a new phenomenon. They have been a feature of international construction contracts for decades and were first used in the US in the 1960s.

In 1968 a “joint consulting board” was set up for the Boundary Dam in Washington State. The idea behind the board was to have people imbedded throughout the lifetime of the project to make quick decisions the moment any sign of a conflict arose. This is the essential purpose of dispute boards today.

Rising popularity

In the 1970s, six major US tunnel projects used dispute boards, including the massive Colorado Eisenhower Tunnel. Their role was to manage relationships between key stakeholders who were involved in delivering the project and to make quick, non-binding, recommendations to the parties when conflicts arose.

Between 1986 and 2002, dispute boards were used on around 350 major civil projects in the US, worth a total of around $80bn—98% of disputes that surfaced on these projects were settled by dispute boards,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll