header-logo header-logo

All change?

11 December 2015 / Tim Hardy
Issue: 7680 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail
nlj_7680_hardy

Are CIArb’s new rules & guidelines innovative or more of the same, asks Tim Hardy

In the past five years, many arbitral institutions have revised their arbitration rules to introduce provisions for emergency arbitrators and include measures for improving efficiency. Consistent with this trend, the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators (CIArb) recently published the 2015 edition of its arbitration rules. The new rules pick up on both of those themes but also include additional arrangements for CIArb to take on the role of appointing authority.

New arbitration rules

This is a new departure from the previous role of the institute and involves not only the appointment of arbitrators in the event of parties failing to reach an agreement, but also resolving challenges to arbitrators on the grounds of lack of independence or impartiality. For the first time in its history, CIArb has established a specialised panel to decide on such challenges.

Some commentators have described CIArb as offering “admin lite” services since it manages so little of the arbitral proceedings. The main advantage of this “admin lite”

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll