header-logo header-logo

All change?

11 December 2015 / Tim Hardy
Issue: 7680 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail
nlj_7680_hardy

Are CIArb’s new rules & guidelines innovative or more of the same, asks Tim Hardy

In the past five years, many arbitral institutions have revised their arbitration rules to introduce provisions for emergency arbitrators and include measures for improving efficiency. Consistent with this trend, the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators (CIArb) recently published the 2015 edition of its arbitration rules. The new rules pick up on both of those themes but also include additional arrangements for CIArb to take on the role of appointing authority.

New arbitration rules

This is a new departure from the previous role of the institute and involves not only the appointment of arbitrators in the event of parties failing to reach an agreement, but also resolving challenges to arbitrators on the grounds of lack of independence or impartiality. For the first time in its history, CIArb has established a specialised panel to decide on such challenges.

Some commentators have described CIArb as offering “admin lite” services since it manages so little of the arbitral proceedings. The main advantage of this “admin lite”

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Steven James

Pillsbury—Steven James

Firm boosts London IP capability with high-profile technology sector hire

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Private client specialist joins as partner in Taunton office

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

Finance and restructuring offering strengthened by partner hire in London

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll