header-logo header-logo

Allegations & NDAs

06 October 2023 / John Gould
Issue: 8043 / Categories: Opinion , Regulatory , Profession
printer mail-detail
141491
Should lawyers be required by regulators to refuse to participate in NDAs in relation to allegations of sexual misconduct? John Gould investigates

Complaints against the former TV personality Russell Brand are just the latest of almost daily allegations of sexual misconduct against celebrities producing high levels of publicity. Whatever the rights and wrongs of any case, the issue of when and how allegations emerge is an important one. Often sexual criminals have been able to cover up their wrongdoing but reputations have also been tarnished by the publicity around false allegations. Recently the Legal Services Board closed its call for evidence on the role of lawyers’ conduct in the misuse of non-disclosure agreements (NDAs). The Bar Council has attracted trenchant criticism from those who campaign for legal restrictions to the use of NDAs for the evidence it submitted.

The controversy centred on the role of lawyers and legal regulators in preventing the perceived misuse of NDAs by clients. Should lawyers be required by regulators to refuse to participate in NDAs in relation

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Steven James

Pillsbury—Steven James

Firm boosts London IP capability with high-profile technology sector hire

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Private client specialist joins as partner in Taunton office

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

Finance and restructuring offering strengthened by partner hire in London

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll