header-logo header-logo

Allegations & NDAs

06 October 2023 / John Gould
Issue: 8043 / Categories: Opinion , Regulatory , Profession
printer mail-detail
141491
Should lawyers be required by regulators to refuse to participate in NDAs in relation to allegations of sexual misconduct? John Gould investigates

Complaints against the former TV personality Russell Brand are just the latest of almost daily allegations of sexual misconduct against celebrities producing high levels of publicity. Whatever the rights and wrongs of any case, the issue of when and how allegations emerge is an important one. Often sexual criminals have been able to cover up their wrongdoing but reputations have also been tarnished by the publicity around false allegations. Recently the Legal Services Board closed its call for evidence on the role of lawyers’ conduct in the misuse of non-disclosure agreements (NDAs). The Bar Council has attracted trenchant criticism from those who campaign for legal restrictions to the use of NDAs for the evidence it submitted.

The controversy centred on the role of lawyers and legal regulators in preventing the perceived misuse of NDAs by clients. Should lawyers be required by regulators to refuse to participate in NDAs in relation

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Peter O’Hare

Pillsbury—Peter O’Hare

Partner hire bolstersprivate capital and global aviation finance offering

Morae—Carla Mendy

Morae—Carla Mendy

Digital and business solutions firm appoints chief operating officer

Twenty Essex—Clementine Makower & Stephen Du

Twenty Essex—Clementine Makower & Stephen Du

Set welcomes two experienced juniors as new tenants

NEWS
The High Court’s decision in Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys has thrown the careers of experienced CILEX litigators into jeopardy, warns Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers in NLJ this week
Sir Brian Leveson’s claim that there is ‘no right to jury trial’ erects a constitutional straw man, argues Professor Graham Zellick KC in NLJ this week. He argues that Leveson dismantles a position almost no-one truly holds, and thereby obscures the deeper issue: the jury’s place within the UK’s constitutional tradition
Why have private prosecutions surged despite limited data? Niall Hearty of Rahman Ravelli explores their rise in this week's NLJ 
The public law team at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer surveys significant recent human rights and judicial review rulings in this week's NLJ
In this week's NLJ, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley examines how debarring orders, while attractive to claimants seeking swift resolution, can complicate trials—most notably in fraud cases requiring ‘particularly cogent’ proof
back-to-top-scroll