header-logo header-logo

Anti-greenwashing rules: climate compliance

31 May 2024 / Teja Pisk
Issue: 8073 / Categories: Features , Commercial , Environment , Company
printer mail-detail
175048
The FCA’s new anti-greenwashing rule has come into force. Businesses need to act—right now—writes Teja Pisk
  • The FCA’s new greenwashing measures aim to protect consumers and improve trust in sustainable investment products and services.
  • Firms must act now or risk ramifications under civil, criminal or regulatory enforcement proceedings—and stay on top of future legislative changes.

In keeping with growing consumer interest in sustainability, the number of products and services claiming to be sustainable and environmentally friendly has increased exponentially in recent years.

This boom in ‘green’ branding has fuelled concerns that organisations are ‘greenwashing’, ie, making false, misleading or unsubstantiated claims about the environmental benefits or impact of their business, products or services.

Changing at pace

The UK’s environmental, social and governance (ESG) legal and regulatory landscape has historically been relatively fragmented (greenwashing, for example, still has no legal definition), but that is now changing at pace, with an array of new ESG-related legislation and regulation that businesses must comply with.

One such development has come from the Financial

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll