header-logo header-logo

28 May 2021 / David Renton
Issue: 7934 / Categories: Features , Housing , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Anti-social behaviour: Nuisance value

49978
David Renton on the growing trend of using criminal courts to obtain orders against tenants accused of anti-social behaviour

Since 2014, landlords have had the power to evict tenants, in principle with no defence, where they have been subject to a ‘closure order’ (an order closing premises in which nuisance or disorder have occurred), or where the tenants have breached a ‘criminal behaviour order’ (the successor to the previous, better known, ‘ASBOs’). As a housing lawyer, I find myself appearing increasingly in the magistrates’ courts, before decision-makers who rarely have much understanding of the conditions you often find in social housing, let alone sympathy for tenants.

In my second week as a barrister, I represented three young men accused of anti-social behaviour. They were accused of smoking cannabis. The police repeatedly stopped them, but nothing was found. In the absence of any charges or convictions, the police applied for orders to exclude the youths from their homes. I acted for the skinniest defendant, Atik. 16 years old, the repeated searches of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll