header-logo header-logo

Anti-social behaviour: Nuisance value

28 May 2021 / David Renton
Issue: 7934 / Categories: Features , Housing , Criminal
printer mail-detail
49978
David Renton on the growing trend of using criminal courts to obtain orders against tenants accused of anti-social behaviour

Since 2014, landlords have had the power to evict tenants, in principle with no defence, where they have been subject to a ‘closure order’ (an order closing premises in which nuisance or disorder have occurred), or where the tenants have breached a ‘criminal behaviour order’ (the successor to the previous, better known, ‘ASBOs’). As a housing lawyer, I find myself appearing increasingly in the magistrates’ courts, before decision-makers who rarely have much understanding of the conditions you often find in social housing, let alone sympathy for tenants.

In my second week as a barrister, I represented three young men accused of anti-social behaviour. They were accused of smoking cannabis. The police repeatedly stopped them, but nothing was found. In the absence of any charges or convictions, the police applied for orders to exclude the youths from their homes. I acted for the skinniest defendant, Atik. 16 years old, the repeated searches of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll