header-logo header-logo

Anti-social behaviour: Nuisance value

28 May 2021 / David Renton
Issue: 7934 / Categories: Features , Housing , Criminal
printer mail-detail
49978
David Renton on the growing trend of using criminal courts to obtain orders against tenants accused of anti-social behaviour

Since 2014, landlords have had the power to evict tenants, in principle with no defence, where they have been subject to a ‘closure order’ (an order closing premises in which nuisance or disorder have occurred), or where the tenants have breached a ‘criminal behaviour order’ (the successor to the previous, better known, ‘ASBOs’). As a housing lawyer, I find myself appearing increasingly in the magistrates’ courts, before decision-makers who rarely have much understanding of the conditions you often find in social housing, let alone sympathy for tenants.

In my second week as a barrister, I represented three young men accused of anti-social behaviour. They were accused of smoking cannabis. The police repeatedly stopped them, but nothing was found. In the absence of any charges or convictions, the police applied for orders to exclude the youths from their homes. I acted for the skinniest defendant, Atik. 16 years old, the repeated searches of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Steven James

Pillsbury—Steven James

Firm boosts London IP capability with high-profile technology sector hire

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Private client specialist joins as partner in Taunton office

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

Finance and restructuring offering strengthened by partner hire in London

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll