header-logo header-logo

04 April 2014 / Janna Purdie
Issue: 7601 / Categories: Features , Expert Witness , Profession
printer mail-detail

April showers

Janna Purdie provides an overview of the forthcoming CPR changes

Various CPR changes come into force during April this year. Here we review those changes coming into force on 22 April relating to costs budgeting. Note: the provisions are currently in draft and are therefore subject to change when laid before Parliament.

Costs budgeting exemptions

Lord Jackson, in his costs report, favoured all multi-track cases being subject to costs budgeting. However, as we all know, last April saw a number of different exemptions and whether they applied depended on a variety of factors eg the court the matter was proceeding in, the value of the claim or the type of claim. This caused an imbalance between the courts and less transparency for practitioners. From 22 April 2014 this is all set to change with the following changes coming into force:

  • costs budgeting will only apply to Pt 7 claims;
  • the existing exemptions are to be removed; and
  • a much more workable blanket exemption is being put into place such that costs budgeting will not apply
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll