header-logo header-logo

08 August 2025 / Masood Ahmed , Osman Mohammed
Issue: 8128 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Arbitration , ADR , CPR
printer mail-detail

Arbitral awards: Final means final

227492
A recent case gives clarity on arbitral awards & stay of execution: Masood Ahmed & Osman Mohammed report
  • In Deinon, the court reaffirmed that there is no stay of execution on arbitral awards without ‘special circumstances’.
  • Once all statutory challenges under the Arbitration Act 1996 are exhausted, enforcement must proceed without delay.

In Deinon Insurance Brokers LLC v Reen and others [2025] EWHC 1263 (Comm), the defendants applied, under CPR 83.7, for a stay of execution and enforcement of six orders in favour of Deinon made in the Commercial Court, and in the London Circuit Commercial Court, on four arbitral awards.

Legal principles

CPR 83.7 applies in all cases in which a party seeks a stay of execution of a money judgment. The applicant must show that ‘special circumstances’ have arisen that render it inexpedient to enforce the judgment or order. The threshold to be met by the applicant is high because creditors should not be deprived of the right to immediate

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Keystone Law—Milena Szuniewicz-Wenzel & Ian Hopkinson

Keystone Law—Milena Szuniewicz-Wenzel & Ian Hopkinson

International arbitration team strengthened by double partner hire

Coodes Solicitors—Pam Johns, Rachel Pearce & Bradley Kaine

Coodes Solicitors—Pam Johns, Rachel Pearce & Bradley Kaine

Firm celebrates trio holding senior regional law society and junior lawyers division roles

Michelman Robinson—Sukhi Kaler

Michelman Robinson—Sukhi Kaler

Partner joins commercial and business litigation team in London

NEWS
The Legal Action Group (LAG)—the UK charity dedicated to advancing access to justice—has unveiled its calendar of training courses, seminars and conferences designed to support lawyers, advisers and other legal professionals in tackling key areas of public interest law
The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 transformed criminal justice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ed Cape of UWE and Matthew Hardcastle and Sandra Paul of Kingsley Napley trace its ‘seismic impact’
Operational resilience is no longer optional. Writing in NLJ this week, Emma Radmore and Michael Lewis of Womble Bond Dickinson explain how UK regulators expect firms to identify ‘important business services’ that could cause ‘intolerable levels of harm’ if disrupted
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
Employment law is shifting at the margins. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ this week, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School examines a Court of Appeal ruling confirming that volunteers are not a special legal species and may qualify as ‘workers’
back-to-top-scroll