header-logo header-logo

08 August 2025 / Masood Ahmed , Osman Mohammed
Issue: 8128 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Arbitration , ADR , CPR
printer mail-detail

Arbitral awards: Final means final

227492
A recent case gives clarity on arbitral awards & stay of execution: Masood Ahmed & Osman Mohammed report
  • In Deinon, the court reaffirmed that there is no stay of execution on arbitral awards without ‘special circumstances’.
  • Once all statutory challenges under the Arbitration Act 1996 are exhausted, enforcement must proceed without delay.

In Deinon Insurance Brokers LLC v Reen and others [2025] EWHC 1263 (Comm), the defendants applied, under CPR 83.7, for a stay of execution and enforcement of six orders in favour of Deinon made in the Commercial Court, and in the London Circuit Commercial Court, on four arbitral awards.

Legal principles

CPR 83.7 applies in all cases in which a party seeks a stay of execution of a money judgment. The applicant must show that ‘special circumstances’ have arisen that render it inexpedient to enforce the judgment or order. The threshold to be met by the applicant is high because creditors should not be deprived of the right to immediate

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers drives further growth in its UK immigration team with new partner Sophie Barrett-Brown

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal invests in next generation of legal talent as specialist litigation practice grows

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips continues momentum in London with arrival of Catrina Smith

NEWS
Restrictions on workplace non-disclosure agreements could make settlements slower, more complex and more expensive when reforms expected in 2027 take effect
Private prosecutors face closer scrutiny under Crown Prosecution Service guidance designed to strengthen accountability and consistency when intervention is requested
Foreign states cannot necessarily claim immunity for cyber operations launched abroad against computers in Britain, following a divided Supreme Court ruling
Defendants who make unsupported complaints about their lawyers risk losing legal aid while confiscation proceedings continue without representation
Lawyers advising Russian clients face different sanctions restrictions across the UK, EU and US, despite their shared objective of increasing pressure on Russia
back-to-top-scroll