header-logo header-logo

08 January 2010
Issue: 7399 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Arbitration

Broda Agro Trade (Cyprus) Ltd v Alfred C. Toepfer International GmbH [2009] EWHC 3318 (Comm), [2009] All ER (D) 176 (Dec)

A person might inform an arbitration tribunal of his view that the tribunal lacked jurisdiction without being held to have taken part in the arbitration proceedings.

However, if he made submissions to the tribunal for it to take into account when exercising its jurisdiction to rule on its own substantive jurisdiction, he risked being held to have taken part in the arbitration proceedings. Section 72 of the Arbitration Act 1996 stated that the condition to be satisfied by a person wishing to avail himself of that section was that he “takes no part in the proceedings”.

It did not state in terms that the condition to be satisfied was that he “takes no part in the proceedings in order to challenge the jurisdiction of the arbitration”. There was no reason to imply any such condition. Section 72 provided that a person who took no part in the arbitration proceedings might question the jurisdiction of the tribunal by

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
The Environment Agency can prosecute offences beyond environmental legislation where proceedings support its statutory functions, the Divisional Court has confirmed
back-to-top-scroll