header-logo header-logo

25 July 2014
Issue: 7617 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Areas of potential law reform revealed

“Logbook loans”, pre-payment vouchers and wills are targeted in the Law Commission’s latest round of reform projects.

The new programme of law reform projects, launched this week, includes the law relating to pre-payments by consumers where the retailer becomes insolvent. Consumers lost about £4.7m on unused vouchers when the retail giant Comet collapsed in 2012. 

The Commission will look at “logbook loans”, where a loan is secured on a debtor’s vehicle with the lender retaining the vehicle registration certificate (or “logbook”). About 60,000 logbook loans are expected to be taken out this year, and interest rates can be as high as 500% APR.

Citizens Advice Gillian Guy, chief executive of Citizens Advice, says: “The current law on logbook loans belongs in the history book. 

“The archaic rules provide a loophole for lenders to overload people with debt and take cars from innocent people. The same protections given to those who take our hire purchase agreements should apply to logbook loans. 

“That would stop innocent second hand car buyers having their car taken away because, unbeknown to them, there was a logbook loan attached.”

Land registration will come under scrutiny in a wide-ranging review of the law in this area—earlier in July, the government abandoned plans to part-privatise the Land Registry. Wills—intestacy, mental capacity and how to remedy mistakes—is another area of potential reform that the Commission will review.  

It will also look at concerns that it is often difficult for professionals to determine the law in Wales, and seek ways to improve the clarity and comprehensibility of Welsh law as well as, in a separate review, planning law in Wales. It will review the law relating to people who lack mental capacity and are in supported living arrangements with a view to improving protection against deprivation of liberty.

The Commission is an independent body set up by the government to recommend proposals for law reform.

 

Issue: 7617 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Investigations and corporate crime expert joins as partner

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Veteran funds specialist joins investment funds team

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Firm enhances competition practice with London partner hire

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll