header-logo header-logo

30 October 2014 / Henrietta Mason , Paola Fudakowska
Issue: 7628 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

The art of the matter

masonfudakowska

Henrietta Mason & Paola Fudakowska provide a wills & probate update

In Rawstron v Freud [2014] EWHC 2577 (Ch), [2014] All ER (D) 14 (Aug), Lucian Freud made his last will on 10 May 2006. It was professionally drawn up and the residue was left as follows: “I give all the residue of my estate (out of which shall be paid my funeral and testamentary expenses and my debts) and any property over which I have a general power of appointment to the said Diana Mary Rawstron and the said Rose Pearce jointly.”

Pearce was one of Freud’s daughters. Rawstron was Freud’s solicitor. She had worked for him since 1986 and for the 20 years before he died had had almost daily contact with him. The will also appointed the two women as sole executors.

Mr Freud died on 20 July 2011 leaving a net estate of around £42m.

Pearce and Rawstron claimed to be absolutely entitled to the residuary estate, while also making clear that this gift

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll