header-logo header-logo

Ask Auntie

30 October 2008
Issue: 7343 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

This Week's Top Question

Is it contemptuous conduct for an advocate to read in court while waiting for his case to be called?

Harvey Rascalle, Cheadle

Anything disrespectful to the judiciary is capable of amounting to contempt although much would depend on the nature of the work in question and whether you are a local solicitor or counsel from up London. Law reports are quite safe provided unaccompanied by nostril picking and consumption of one of the noisier brands of crisps. Any legal articles on judicially reviewing the Legal Services Commission or cracking the coded orders of Mr Justice Peter Smith could be dodgy. Better to secrete behind the cover of the Church Times or keep an ear on the proceedings and laugh helplessly every time the judge cracks a joke. None of these rules applies to the centres of graffiti excellence they call magistrates' courts where soft porn can be openly studied. Indeed, the “stipe” may insist on you sharing it with him.

* * * * * *

I am arranging a short break from practice

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll