header-logo header-logo

BAA dominance under pressure

16 August 2007
Issue: 7286 / Categories: Legal News , Competition , Commercial
printer mail-detail

News

BAA could be forced to get rid of at least one of its airports to ensure standards are raised at the ones it retains, as a result of the Competition Commission’s (CC’s) investigation into the supply of airport services by BAA in the UK.

The Office of Fair Trading made the reference to the CC in March. The CC will now determine whether or not there are any features of the market that prevent, restrict or distort competition and, if so, what remedial action might be taken. BAA owns seven airports: Heathrow, Gatwick, Stansted and Southampton in England; and Edinburgh, Glasgow and Aberdeen in Scotland.

Tom Morrison, an associate at Rollits Solicitors, says the investigation has come about largely as a result of the level of complaints about the standard and availability of facilities at BAA’s airports, most notably at Heathrow, coupled with the belief among many that operational and capacity issues would be addressed quicker and more effectively by an owner which was facing competition from neighbouring airports. 

“One of the outcomes of the investigation could well be that BAA is forced to divest of one or more of its airports in the hope that standards at the retained and divested airports will be raised as a result of having to compete for airlines and travellers’ business,” he says.

BAA, he adds, does not deny there are problems, but puts the blame on planning and other regulatory issues. “Whether BAA would put more time, effort and money into overcoming those issues if it faced competition from rival airport operators is something which should become apparent once this investigation has been completed. While we cannot pre-judge the outcome, common sense would seem to indicate that it is not healthy for one airport operator to have such dominance over the handling of flights in the south east,” he says.

Issue: 7286 / Categories: Legal News , Competition , Commercial
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
back-to-top-scroll