header-logo header-logo

16 August 2007
Issue: 7286 / Categories: Legal News , Competition , Commercial
printer mail-detail

BAA dominance under pressure

News

BAA could be forced to get rid of at least one of its airports to ensure standards are raised at the ones it retains, as a result of the Competition Commission’s (CC’s) investigation into the supply of airport services by BAA in the UK.

The Office of Fair Trading made the reference to the CC in March. The CC will now determine whether or not there are any features of the market that prevent, restrict or distort competition and, if so, what remedial action might be taken. BAA owns seven airports: Heathrow, Gatwick, Stansted and Southampton in England; and Edinburgh, Glasgow and Aberdeen in Scotland.

Tom Morrison, an associate at Rollits Solicitors, says the investigation has come about largely as a result of the level of complaints about the standard and availability of facilities at BAA’s airports, most notably at Heathrow, coupled with the belief among many that operational and capacity issues would be addressed quicker and more effectively by an owner which was facing competition from neighbouring airports. 

“One of the outcomes of the investigation could well be that BAA is forced to divest of one or more of its airports in the hope that standards at the retained and divested airports will be raised as a result of having to compete for airlines and travellers’ business,” he says.

BAA, he adds, does not deny there are problems, but puts the blame on planning and other regulatory issues. “Whether BAA would put more time, effort and money into overcoming those issues if it faced competition from rival airport operators is something which should become apparent once this investigation has been completed. While we cannot pre-judge the outcome, common sense would seem to indicate that it is not healthy for one airport operator to have such dominance over the handling of flights in the south east,” he says.

Issue: 7286 / Categories: Legal News , Competition , Commercial
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Debevoise & Plimpton—Mary Lavelle

Debevoise & Plimpton—Mary Lavelle

Debevoise expands London secondaries team with addition of Mary Lavelle

Excello Law—Hestia Private Client

Excello Law—Hestia Private Client

Excello Law welcomes ex-Irwin Mitchell team to launch Hestia Private Client

Carpmaels & Ransford—Christopher Stothers

Carpmaels & Ransford—Christopher Stothers

Heavyweight patent litigator will bolster Carpmaels Ransford’s rapidly growing Litigation team as firm marks its 250th anniversary

NEWS
Lawyers have welcomed plans to create specialist rape and serious sex offences courtrooms at every Crown Court
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
back-to-top-scroll