header-logo header-logo

16 August 2007
Issue: 7286 / Categories: Legal News , Competition , Commercial
printer mail-detail

BAA dominance under pressure

News

BAA could be forced to get rid of at least one of its airports to ensure standards are raised at the ones it retains, as a result of the Competition Commission’s (CC’s) investigation into the supply of airport services by BAA in the UK.

The Office of Fair Trading made the reference to the CC in March. The CC will now determine whether or not there are any features of the market that prevent, restrict or distort competition and, if so, what remedial action might be taken. BAA owns seven airports: Heathrow, Gatwick, Stansted and Southampton in England; and Edinburgh, Glasgow and Aberdeen in Scotland.

Tom Morrison, an associate at Rollits Solicitors, says the investigation has come about largely as a result of the level of complaints about the standard and availability of facilities at BAA’s airports, most notably at Heathrow, coupled with the belief among many that operational and capacity issues would be addressed quicker and more effectively by an owner which was facing competition from neighbouring airports. 

“One of the outcomes of the investigation could well be that BAA is forced to divest of one or more of its airports in the hope that standards at the retained and divested airports will be raised as a result of having to compete for airlines and travellers’ business,” he says.

BAA, he adds, does not deny there are problems, but puts the blame on planning and other regulatory issues. “Whether BAA would put more time, effort and money into overcoming those issues if it faced competition from rival airport operators is something which should become apparent once this investigation has been completed. While we cannot pre-judge the outcome, common sense would seem to indicate that it is not healthy for one airport operator to have such dominance over the handling of flights in the south east,” he says.

Issue: 7286 / Categories: Legal News , Competition , Commercial
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Laytons ETL—Maximilian Kraitt

Laytons ETL—Maximilian Kraitt

Commercial firm strengthens real estate disputes team with associate hire

Switalskis—three appointments

Switalskis—three appointments

Firm appoints three directors to board

Browne Jacobson—seven promotions

Browne Jacobson—seven promotions

Six promoted to partner and one to legal director across UK and Ireland offices

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll