header-logo header-logo

Back to basics

16 January 2015 / Shane Crawford
Issue: 7636 / Categories: Features , Disciplinary&grievance procedures , Employment
printer mail-detail
shanecrawford

When can disciplinary procedures be instigated & what process applies? Shane Crawford reports

It is regularly assumed that if a disciplinary process exists, by virtue of a reference within the contract of employment, then an employer is entitled to implement it, if acting in good faith without rebuke.

Two recent cases have highlighted the importance of asking two basic questions before the commencement of a disciplinary process:

  • What disciplinary process is applicable according to the contract of employment?
  • When is it appropriate to implement the disciplinary procedure?

Davies v London Borough of Haringey [2014] EWCH 3393 (QB) emphasised the importance of close scrutiny of the contract of employment to determine which disciplinary process had effect and therefore, who had the power to suspend.

Mian v Coventry University [2014] EWCA Civ 1275 revisited the test for an employer’s decision to commence disciplinary proceedings.

Determining who has the power to discipline an employee

The High Court in Davies v London Borough of Haringey was faced with a challenge by a teacher to the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll