header-logo header-logo

Back to the drawing board?

27 May 2010 / Nicola Mcleod , Eoin O’Shea , Alex Beal
Issue: 7419 / Categories: Features , Regulatory , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Eoin O’Shea, Nicola McLeod & Alex Beal say the SFO will have to reconsider penalties for bribery

The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) published guidance entitled, Approach of the Serious Fraud Office to Dealing with Overseas Corruption, on 21 July 2009. The guidance encourages self-reporting of corruption offences by corporate entities. It provides for the possibility of a “global settlement” with the SFO where liability arises in another jurisdiction, and makes plain the SFO’s willingness to negotiate on the subject of penalties. It also makes plain that in the right circumstances (such as self-reporting and co-operation with the SFO’s investigation, as well as a commitment to reform of corporate practices and procedures) the SFO would recommend that only civil penalties be imposed (pursuant to its powers under Pt 5 of the Proceeds of Crime Act).

On the other hand, the guidance makes clear that, in the absence of cooperation and self-reporting, companies paying bribes should not expect leniency. The chances of a criminal prosecution are increased. The

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
back-to-top-scroll