header-logo header-logo

27 May 2010 / Nicola Mcleod , Eoin O’Shea , Alex Beal
Issue: 7419 / Categories: Features , Regulatory , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Back to the drawing board?

Eoin O’Shea, Nicola McLeod & Alex Beal say the SFO will have to reconsider penalties for bribery

The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) published guidance entitled, Approach of the Serious Fraud Office to Dealing with Overseas Corruption, on 21 July 2009. The guidance encourages self-reporting of corruption offences by corporate entities. It provides for the possibility of a “global settlement” with the SFO where liability arises in another jurisdiction, and makes plain the SFO’s willingness to negotiate on the subject of penalties. It also makes plain that in the right circumstances (such as self-reporting and co-operation with the SFO’s investigation, as well as a commitment to reform of corporate practices and procedures) the SFO would recommend that only civil penalties be imposed (pursuant to its powers under Pt 5 of the Proceeds of Crime Act).

On the other hand, the guidance makes clear that, in the absence of cooperation and self-reporting, companies paying bribes should not expect leniency. The chances of a criminal prosecution are increased. The

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers drives further growth in its UK immigration team with new partner Sophie Barrett-Brown

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal invests in next generation of legal talent as specialist litigation practice grows

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips continues momentum in London with arrival of Catrina Smith

NEWS
Restrictions on workplace non-disclosure agreements could make settlements slower, more complex and more expensive when reforms expected in 2027 take effect
Private prosecutors face closer scrutiny under Crown Prosecution Service guidance designed to strengthen accountability and consistency when intervention is requested
Foreign states cannot necessarily claim immunity for cyber operations launched abroad against computers in Britain, following a divided Supreme Court ruling
Defendants who make unsupported complaints about their lawyers risk losing legal aid while confiscation proceedings continue without representation
Lawyers advising Russian clients face different sanctions restrictions across the UK, EU and US, despite their shared objective of increasing pressure on Russia
back-to-top-scroll