header-logo header-logo

Back to the future

14 October 2010 / Ian Smith
Issue: 7437 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

The Equality Act is here, but we’d have liked more notice, says Ian Smith

It used to be fairly standard for governments to tell us when laws were going to come into force (along, often with important subsidiary rules) all of a couple of days before the commencement date.

We might have hoped that this now belonged to the BAD OLD DAYS (definition of which, please, on a postcard to the editor) but they seem to have indulged in an element of backsliding on the major commencement order for the Equality Act 2010 (EqA 2010), which finally made its appearance two thirds of the way through September, for a commencement date of 1 October. We do now have it (No 4 Order SI 2010/2317) and it is of some complexity where certain transitional provisions are concerned (some of the most complex of which, bizarrely, concern hovercraft, which are obviously a hotbed of illegal discrimination).

Of greater interest politically are the provisions of the Act which are not brought into effect.

The old public

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
In NLJ this week, Bea Rossetto of the National Pro Bono Centre marks Pro Bono Week by urging lawyers to recognise the emotional toll of pro bono work
Can a lease legally last only days—or even hours? Professor Mark Pawlowski of the University of Greenwich explores the question in this week's NLJ
RFC Seraing v FIFA, in which the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) reaffirmed that awards by the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) may be reviewed by EU courts on public-policy grounds, is under examination in this week's NLJ by Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law, Zurich
back-to-top-scroll