header-logo header-logo

14 October 2010 / Ian Smith
Issue: 7437 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Back to the future

The Equality Act is here, but we’d have liked more notice, says Ian Smith

It used to be fairly standard for governments to tell us when laws were going to come into force (along, often with important subsidiary rules) all of a couple of days before the commencement date.

We might have hoped that this now belonged to the BAD OLD DAYS (definition of which, please, on a postcard to the editor) but they seem to have indulged in an element of backsliding on the major commencement order for the Equality Act 2010 (EqA 2010), which finally made its appearance two thirds of the way through September, for a commencement date of 1 October. We do now have it (No 4 Order SI 2010/2317) and it is of some complexity where certain transitional provisions are concerned (some of the most complex of which, bizarrely, concern hovercraft, which are obviously a hotbed of illegal discrimination).

Of greater interest politically are the provisions of the Act which are not brought into effect.

The old public

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll