header-logo header-logo

14 October 2010 / Ian Smith
Issue: 7437 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Back to the future

The Equality Act is here, but we’d have liked more notice, says Ian Smith

It used to be fairly standard for governments to tell us when laws were going to come into force (along, often with important subsidiary rules) all of a couple of days before the commencement date.

We might have hoped that this now belonged to the BAD OLD DAYS (definition of which, please, on a postcard to the editor) but they seem to have indulged in an element of backsliding on the major commencement order for the Equality Act 2010 (EqA 2010), which finally made its appearance two thirds of the way through September, for a commencement date of 1 October. We do now have it (No 4 Order SI 2010/2317) and it is of some complexity where certain transitional provisions are concerned (some of the most complex of which, bizarrely, concern hovercraft, which are obviously a hotbed of illegal discrimination).

Of greater interest politically are the provisions of the Act which are not brought into effect.

The old public

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll