header-logo header-logo

Back to the future

06 February 2015 / Ian Gascoigne
Issue: 7639 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

Predicting the future: 2015 in commercial disputes, by Ian Gascoigne

A year ago, New Law Journal published an article in which a colleague and I speculated on the outlook for commercial litigation in 2014 (see “Opportunities & threats”, 164 NLJ 7594, p 6). Principally, we said that the courts’ grip on case management would tighten in the aftermath of Mitchell v News Group Newspapers [2013] EWCA Civ 1537, [2014] 2 All ER 430, but damages-based agreements would turn out to be slow burners. Both predictions proved to be correct. Resisting the advice to “quit while ahead”, the challenge of foreshadowing what will occur in 2015 is not as easy. I see it as a year of consolidation after two years’ upheaval.

Subtle difference

The outlook for commercial claims in 2015 is subtly different from a year ago. Then, the much-feared Jackson reforms, in use for nine months, were creating a real stir among dispute lawyers. Although at the start of 2014 many commercial claims were excluded from the rigour of mandatory costs

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll