header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
13 September 2007 / Tim Crosley , Michael Walsh
Issue: 7288 / Categories: Features , Tax
printer mail-detail

Bad pennies

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Tim Crosley and Michael Walsh analyse the implications of HMRC’s defeat in Sempra

“Legal rules which are not soundly based resemble proverbial bad pennies: they turn up again and again.” The bad penny to which Lord Nicholls was referring was the “negative attitude of English law to awards of compound interest on claims for debts paid late” in Sempra Metals Ltd v IRC [2007] UKHL 34, [2007] All ER (D) 294 (Jul). In a complex and lengthy judgment where all five law lords had their say, the majority refused the appeal of HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC). The origins of the claim lie in the unlawful levying of advance corporation tax (ACT) by the UK government, but the decision is undoubtably of more general significance.

BACKGROUND

The UK required UK companies paying a dividend to pay ACT to HMRC from 1973 until its abolition in 1999. As the name suggests, ACT was an advance payment of corporation tax. ACT paid could be set off against the UK company’s normal liability to pay corporation

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Sanctions ruling casts ‘wide net’ over global finance
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
NLJ this week: England’s courts cement status as fraud battleground
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
NLJ this week: Mazur ruling puts firms on supervision alert
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
NLJ this week: Landlords’ forced entry powers spark legal divide
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
NLJ this week: Push to scrap ‘vague’ public office misconduct law
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll