header-logo header-logo

02 March 2022
Categories: Movers & Shakers , Profession
printer mail-detail

Baker & Partners—James Sheedy

Offshore disputes firm promotes partner

Independent specialist offshore litigation and dispute resolution firm, Baker & Partners, has recently announced the promotion of senior associate James Sheedy to the firm’s partnership, effective immediately.

James is a senior litigator. He has a particular expertise in the most complex trust disputes though his practice embraces contentious commercial and company law matters. He is the author of Litigating Trust Disputes in Jersey: Law, Procedure & Remedies, the first practitioner text dedicated exclusively to trust litigation. He is called to the bars of both England and Wales and Jersey.

James joined the Baker & Partners team in 2014. In 2019, he was ranked as a Notable Practitioner in the Chambers & Partners OfIfshore Dispute Resolution Guide. He has been recognised as a ‘Rising Star’ in Legal 500 for the last three years. In 2021 he was shortlisted for CityWealth’s IFC Senior Associate Lawyer of the Year and has twice won eprivateclient's Channel Islands Top 35 Under 35.

He is a member of the Association of Contentious Trust & Estate Practitioners (ACTAPS), the Contentious Trust Association (ConTrA) and the Chancery Bar Association, and is a member of the Trust Law Working Committee of Jersey Finance that considers reforms to the Jersey’s Trusts Law.

Speaking of his promotion, James said: 'Since joining Baker & Partners in 2014, I have thoroughly enjoyed working as part of this top-class team which dedicates itself to delivering outstanding results for our clients. The firm continues to go from strength to strength, and remains at the forefront of the most complex multi-jurisdictional disputes. I am extremely pleased to join the partnership at such an exciting time of growth and momentum for the firm.'

Stephen Baker, Senior Partner at Baker & Partners, commented: 'It is with great pleasure that we welcome James to the partnership. Since joining the team eight years ago, he has played an integral part in some of our most complex cases, cultivating an enviable personal reputation particularly for complex trust work in Jersey. His drive and dedication to his clients made the decision to promote him to partner very straightforward.'

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Elborne Mitchell & Myton Law

Weightmans—Elborne Mitchell & Myton Law

Firm expands in London and Leeds with dual merger

Boodle Hatfield—Clare Pooley & Michael Duffy

Boodle Hatfield—Clare Pooley & Michael Duffy

Private wealth and real estate firmpromotes two to partner and five to senior associate

Constantine Law—James Baker & Julie Goodway

Constantine Law—James Baker & Julie Goodway

Agile firm expands employment team with two partner hires

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll