header-logo header-logo

Bankruptcy annulled

10 March 2011
Issue: 7456 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

The High Court has annulled the bankruptcy of a woman who lacked capacity and ruled that HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) breached its duties under the Disability Discrimination Act 1995 (DDA 1995).

Nicola Haworth suffered physical injuries in an accident and suffered from chronic mental illness, including a phobia of opening mail. She bred horses as a non-money-making hobby. Following a tip-off that she was running a commercial enterprise, HMRC wrote to request tax returns and, when they did not receive any, assessed Ms Haworth as owing over £192,000 in tax.

Her benefits were stopped, she lost her horses, and HMRC obtained a bankruptcy order against her. In 2007, Ms Haworth’s mother had written to HMRC, explaining the situation.

The court held that HMRC failed to make reasonable adjustments as required under the DDA 1995 and it could have considered alternative enforcement methods, or made further contact with Ms Haworth’s mother.

Rachel Sleeman, of Five Paper, who represented Ms Haworth, says: “Public authorities should ensure they are aware of their duties under the DDA and the Equality Act 2010 when they take steps to make someone bankrupt, and must reasonably adjust their practices, policies and procedures accordingly.”
 

Issue: 7456 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll