Bankruptcy law: reading between the lines

A fresh start: Max Marenbon & Anneliese Mondschein praise the court’s increasingly modern approach to interpreting statutory bankruptcy powers

In modern English bankruptcy law, the courts restrict their broad statutory powers by finding implicit procedural protections for bankrupt individuals, as two welcome recent decisions show.

Two recent decisions highlight the weight being given by the courts to the procedural rights of bankrupt individuals, both before and after discharge from bankruptcy. Re Ferster [2022] EWHC 1060 (Ch), [2022] All ER (D) 81 (May) emphasised the common law limitations on the prima facie wide-ranging power to suspend discharge from bankruptcy under s 279(4) of the Insolvency Act 1986 (IA 1986) for non-compliance with an obligation. In Kennedy v The Official Receiver [2022] EWHC 1973 (Ch), the High Court prioritised consistency and certainty for the bankrupt over judicial flexibility in determining the appropriate duration of a bankruptcy restrictions order under s 281A and Sch 4A, IA 1986.

Both cases exemplify the court’s readiness to read implicit common law constraints

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content

If you are already a subscriber sign in

...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

Bankruptcy law: reading between the lines

A fresh start: Max Marenbon & Anneliese Mondschein praise the court’s increasingly modern approach to interpreting statutory bankruptcy powers

In modern English bankruptcy law, the courts restrict their broad statutory powers by finding implicit procedural protections for bankrupt individuals, as two welcome recent decisions show.

Both cases exemplify the court’s readiness to read implicit common law constraints

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content

If you are already a subscriber sign in

...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

SourceURL:

Links:

E-newsletter Sign-Up

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All

Hugh James—Jonathan Askin

London corporate and commercial team announces partner appointment

Michelman Robinson—Daniel Burbeary

Firm names partner as London office managing partner

Kingsley Napley—Jonathan Grimes

Firm appoints new head of criminal litigation team

NEWS

Read All

APIL sees off ‘substantial prejudice’ defence

Personal injury lawyers have welcomed a government U-turn on a ‘substantial prejudice’ defence that risked enabling defendants in child sexual abuse civil cases to have proceedings against them dropped

‘Lost years’ precedent overturned

Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment

NLJ this week: Neutral counsel in a polarised age

The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’

NLJ this week: Short lets & sharp covenants

Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes

NLJ this week: Justice at the algorithm’s edge

Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing

Error message

Bankruptcy law: reading between the lines

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hugh James—Jonathan Askin

Michelman Robinson—Daniel Burbeary

Kingsley Napley—Jonathan Grimes