Bankruptcy law: reading between the lines

08 September 2023 / Max Marenbon , Anneliese Mondschein

Issue: 8039 / Categories: Features , Insolvency , Commercial , Company

A fresh start: Max Marenbon & Anneliese Mondschein praise the court’s increasingly modern approach to interpreting statutory bankruptcy powers

In modern English bankruptcy law, the courts restrict their broad statutory powers by finding implicit procedural protections for bankrupt individuals, as two welcome recent decisions show.

Two recent decisions highlight the weight being given by the courts to the procedural rights of bankrupt individuals, both before and after discharge from bankruptcy. Re Ferster [2022] EWHC 1060 (Ch), [2022] All ER (D) 81 (May) emphasised the common law limitations on the prima facie wide-ranging power to suspend discharge from bankruptcy under s 279(4) of the Insolvency Act 1986 (IA 1986) for non-compliance with an obligation. In Kennedy v The Official Receiver [2022] EWHC 1973 (Ch), the High Court prioritised consistency and certainty for the bankrupt over judicial flexibility in determining the appropriate duration of a bankruptcy restrictions order under s 281A and Sch 4A, IA 1986.

Both cases exemplify the court’s readiness to read implicit common law constraints

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content

If you are already a subscriber sign in

...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

Bankruptcy law: reading between the lines

A fresh start: Max Marenbon & Anneliese Mondschein praise the court’s increasingly modern approach to interpreting statutory bankruptcy powers

In modern English bankruptcy law, the courts restrict their broad statutory powers by finding implicit procedural protections for bankrupt individuals, as two welcome recent decisions show.

Both cases exemplify the court’s readiness to read implicit common law constraints

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content

If you are already a subscriber sign in

...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

SourceURL:

Links:

E-newsletter Sign-Up

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All

Pillsbury—Peter O’Hare

Partner hire bolstersprivate capital and global aviation finance offering

Morae—Carla Mendy

Digital and business solutions firm appoints chief operating officer

Twenty Essex—Clementine Makower & Stephen Du

Set welcomes two experienced juniors as new tenants

NEWS

Read All

NLJ this week: Alarm bells over Mazur

The High Court’s decision in Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys has thrown the careers of experienced CILEX litigators into jeopardy, warns Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers in NLJ this week

NLJ this week: Jury trial & a constitutional illusion

Sir Brian Leveson’s claim that there is ‘no right to jury trial’ erects a constitutional straw man, argues Professor Graham Zellick KC in NLJ this week. He argues that Leveson dismantles a position almost no-one truly holds, and thereby obscures the deeper issue: the jury’s place within the UK’s constitutional tradition

NLJ this week: The rise—and risks—of going private

Why have private prosecutions surged despite limited data? Niall Hearty of Rahman Ravelli explores their rise in this week's NLJ

NLJ this week: Human rights disputes push courts to redefine their role

The public law team at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer surveys significant recent human rights and judicial review rulings in this week's NLJ

NLJ this week: Debarment orders—shortcut or minefield?

In this week's NLJ, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley examines how debarring orders, while attractive to claimants seeking swift resolution, can complicate trials—most notably in fraud cases requiring ‘particularly cogent’ proof

Error message

Bankruptcy law: reading between the lines

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Peter O’Hare

Morae—Carla Mendy

Twenty Essex—Clementine Makower & Stephen Du