header-logo header-logo

05 May 2021
Issue: 7931 / Categories: Legal News , Mental health , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Banks v Goodfellow test still works

The High Court has clarified that a test for capacity from an 1870 case remains good law, in a bitter wills dispute between two siblings.

Mrs Justice Falk handed down judgment this week in Clitheroe v Bond [2021] EWHC 1102 (Ch).

Amanda Smallcombe, partner at Birkett Long, which acted for Susan Bond, said Falks J held the test in the 1870 case of Banks v Goodfellow was the correct test to apply when considering testamentary capacity retrospectively, and had not been swept away by the Mental Capacity Act 2005.

Lucinda Brown, partner at BDB Pitmans, said practitioners would welcome the clarity the decision brings that a test in use for the past 150 years remains good. Brown said the judgment also provided detail on the proper test for establishing whether a delusion is present, which requires a holistic assessment of the evidence, taking into account the nature of the belief, circumstances and evidential basis for and against it.

Issue: 7931 / Categories: Legal News , Mental health , Wills & Probate
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
The Environment Agency can prosecute offences beyond environmental legislation where proceedings support its statutory functions, the Divisional Court has confirmed
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
back-to-top-scroll