header-logo header-logo

05 May 2021
Issue: 7931 / Categories: Legal News , Mental health , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Banks v Goodfellow test still works

The High Court has clarified that a test for capacity from an 1870 case remains good law, in a bitter wills dispute between two siblings.

Mrs Justice Falk handed down judgment this week in Clitheroe v Bond [2021] EWHC 1102 (Ch).

Amanda Smallcombe, partner at Birkett Long, which acted for Susan Bond, said Falks J held the test in the 1870 case of Banks v Goodfellow was the correct test to apply when considering testamentary capacity retrospectively, and had not been swept away by the Mental Capacity Act 2005.

Lucinda Brown, partner at BDB Pitmans, said practitioners would welcome the clarity the decision brings that a test in use for the past 150 years remains good. Brown said the judgment also provided detail on the proper test for establishing whether a delusion is present, which requires a holistic assessment of the evidence, taking into account the nature of the belief, circumstances and evidential basis for and against it.

Issue: 7931 / Categories: Legal News , Mental health , Wills & Probate
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll