header-logo header-logo

05 May 2021
Issue: 7931 / Categories: Legal News , Mental health , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Banks v Goodfellow test still works

The High Court has clarified that a test for capacity from an 1870 case remains good law, in a bitter wills dispute between two siblings.

Mrs Justice Falk handed down judgment this week in Clitheroe v Bond [2021] EWHC 1102 (Ch).

Amanda Smallcombe, partner at Birkett Long, which acted for Susan Bond, said Falks J held the test in the 1870 case of Banks v Goodfellow was the correct test to apply when considering testamentary capacity retrospectively, and had not been swept away by the Mental Capacity Act 2005.

Lucinda Brown, partner at BDB Pitmans, said practitioners would welcome the clarity the decision brings that a test in use for the past 150 years remains good. Brown said the judgment also provided detail on the proper test for establishing whether a delusion is present, which requires a holistic assessment of the evidence, taking into account the nature of the belief, circumstances and evidential basis for and against it.

Issue: 7931 / Categories: Legal News , Mental health , Wills & Probate
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Charles Russell Speechlys—James Paterson

Charles Russell Speechlys—James Paterson

Charles Russell Speechlys further bolsters Private Equity expertise with the appointment of James Paterson

Ellisons—Samuel Flower

Ellisons—Samuel Flower

Ellisons strengthens Rural Affairs team with senior appointment

Sidley—Carl Hotton

Sidley—Carl Hotton

Sidley adds insurance mergers and acquisitions partner to London office

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll