header-logo header-logo

05 May 2021
Issue: 7931 / Categories: Legal News , Mental health , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Banks v Goodfellow test still works

The High Court has clarified that a test for capacity from an 1870 case remains good law, in a bitter wills dispute between two siblings.

Mrs Justice Falk handed down judgment this week in Clitheroe v Bond [2021] EWHC 1102 (Ch).

Amanda Smallcombe, partner at Birkett Long, which acted for Susan Bond, said Falks J held the test in the 1870 case of Banks v Goodfellow was the correct test to apply when considering testamentary capacity retrospectively, and had not been swept away by the Mental Capacity Act 2005.

Lucinda Brown, partner at BDB Pitmans, said practitioners would welcome the clarity the decision brings that a test in use for the past 150 years remains good. Brown said the judgment also provided detail on the proper test for establishing whether a delusion is present, which requires a holistic assessment of the evidence, taking into account the nature of the belief, circumstances and evidential basis for and against it.

Issue: 7931 / Categories: Legal News , Mental health , Wills & Probate
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

Senior appointments in insurance services and commercial services announced

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Aviation disputes practice strengthened by London partner hire

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Residential property lawyer promoted to partnership

NEWS
he abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC
Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll