header-logo header-logo

24 November 2016
Issue: 7724 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Bar Chair defends judicial independence

The Chairman of the Bar has mounted a staunch defence of judicial independence and the rule of law, following attacks on judges in newspapers and on social media.

The Supreme Court will sit next month to hear the appeal of the Art 50 case, on whether Parliament must be consulted before the UK can begin the process of leaving the EU. A front-page headline in The Daily Mail branded the three judges hearing the case “Enemies of the People”. Death threats and abuse have been levelled against one of the claimants, Gina Miller.

Writing in NLJ this week, Chantal-Aimée Doerries QC, Chairman of the Bar, says: “We take for granted at our peril the relative stability and adherence to the rule of law in our society.

“If society does not value and respect the justice system, including the judges and their judgments, much of the benefit of an independent, transparent justice system is lost. Having seen countries where people are fighting to establish a viable justice system, we cannot afford not to stand up for ours.”

Doerries also disputes suggestions that the Bar Council was asking the Lord Chancellor to attack the freedom of the press when it asked her to speak out about tone and nature of the comments. She points out that there is a difference between disagreeing with what someone says and preventing them saying it.

Issue: 7724 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details
RELATED ARTICLES

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Firm strengthens global fund finance practice with London partner hire.

DWF—Stephen Webb

DWF—Stephen Webb

Partner and head of national planning team appointed

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

Corporate team expands in Birmingham with partner hire

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll