header-logo header-logo

24 November 2016
Issue: 7724 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Bar Chair defends judicial independence

The Chairman of the Bar has mounted a staunch defence of judicial independence and the rule of law, following attacks on judges in newspapers and on social media.

The Supreme Court will sit next month to hear the appeal of the Art 50 case, on whether Parliament must be consulted before the UK can begin the process of leaving the EU. A front-page headline in The Daily Mail branded the three judges hearing the case “Enemies of the People”. Death threats and abuse have been levelled against one of the claimants, Gina Miller.

Writing in NLJ this week, Chantal-Aimée Doerries QC, Chairman of the Bar, says: “We take for granted at our peril the relative stability and adherence to the rule of law in our society.

“If society does not value and respect the justice system, including the judges and their judgments, much of the benefit of an independent, transparent justice system is lost. Having seen countries where people are fighting to establish a viable justice system, we cannot afford not to stand up for ours.”

Doerries also disputes suggestions that the Bar Council was asking the Lord Chancellor to attack the freedom of the press when it asked her to speak out about tone and nature of the comments. She points out that there is a difference between disagreeing with what someone says and preventing them saying it.

Issue: 7724 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details
RELATED ARTICLES

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—Nathan Evans

Birketts—Nathan Evans

Commercial and technology team in Cambridge strengthened by partner hire

Andrew & Andrew Solicitors—Shikha Datta

Andrew & Andrew Solicitors—Shikha Datta

Hampshire firm appoints head of new family department

Latham & Watkins—Sarah Lightdale

Latham & Watkins—Sarah Lightdale

Firm strengthens securities practice with partner return

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll