header-logo header-logo

03 April 2019
Issue: 7835 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Regulatory
printer mail-detail

Bar misconduct threshold lowered

Barristers accused of professional misconduct will be prosecuted with the civil standard of proof in future, following a change to their professional code.

The new edition of the Bar Standards Board (BSB) Handbook, published this week, adopts the lower threshold of balance of probabilities or ‘more likely than not’ for conduct that occurs from 1 April 2019. Previously, alleged breaches of the Bar’s code of conduct have been judged according to the criminal standard of proof, beyond reasonable doubt or ‘satisfied so as to be sure’.

The move brings barristers in line with the rest of the legal profession and most other professions—the BSB and the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons are currently the only professional regulators applying the criminal standard.

The BSB consulted on the move in 2017.

BSB director general, Dr Vanessa Davies, said: ‘This is an important moment in the ongoing modernisation of our regulatory arrangements. The public and the profession can continue to have confidence that our disciplinary proceedings are robust, thorough and fair to all concerned.’

Issue: 7835 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Regulatory
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Michelman Robinson—Daniel Burbeary

Michelman Robinson—Daniel Burbeary

Firm names partner as London office managing partner

Bellevue Law—Sally Hall

Bellevue Law—Sally Hall

Employment boutique strengthens data protection and privacy offering with senior consultant hire

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

NEWS
Personal injury lawyers have welcomed a government U-turn on a ‘substantial prejudice’ defence that risked enabling defendants in child sexual abuse civil cases to have proceedings against them dropped
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
back-to-top-scroll