header-logo header-logo

03 April 2019
Issue: 7835 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Regulatory
printer mail-detail

Bar misconduct threshold lowered

Barristers accused of professional misconduct will be prosecuted with the civil standard of proof in future, following a change to their professional code.

The new edition of the Bar Standards Board (BSB) Handbook, published this week, adopts the lower threshold of balance of probabilities or ‘more likely than not’ for conduct that occurs from 1 April 2019. Previously, alleged breaches of the Bar’s code of conduct have been judged according to the criminal standard of proof, beyond reasonable doubt or ‘satisfied so as to be sure’.

The move brings barristers in line with the rest of the legal profession and most other professions—the BSB and the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons are currently the only professional regulators applying the criminal standard.

The BSB consulted on the move in 2017.

BSB director general, Dr Vanessa Davies, said: ‘This is an important moment in the ongoing modernisation of our regulatory arrangements. The public and the profession can continue to have confidence that our disciplinary proceedings are robust, thorough and fair to all concerned.’

Issue: 7835 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Regulatory
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll