header-logo header-logo

16 November 2022
Issue: 8003 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus , Profession
printer mail-detail

Bar pleads: no more budget cuts

Budget cuts, LASPO’s ten-year legacy and recent political decisions have devastated access to justice, according to a major piece of research by the Bar Council.

The report, ‘Access denied: the state of the justice system in England and Wales in 2022’, paints a worrying picture in which 239 court closures since 2010 have left low-income clients unable to afford travel fares to their hearings, while many remaining courts are in crumbling buildings with leaks and infestations and even without basic facilities.

Meanwhile, LASPO (the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012) ‘significantly’ restricted access to civil legal aid and the subsequent increase in litigants in person has resulted in cases taking longer and costing more. The Bar Council report highlights that litigants have had a ‘mixed experience’ of remote justice, which requires further investigation.

It also found barristers are diversifying away from legal aid work due to workload pressures and poor remuneration, further reducing the capacity of the system. Moreover, political attacks on the rule of law and anti-lawyer rhetoric are undermining confidence in the justice system.

The report combines data from the Bar Council’s Access to Justice dashboard with testimony from barristers and other practitioners who took part in a Justice Week workshop earlier this year.

Mark Fenhalls KC, chair of the Bar, said: ‘Through the evidence presented in this report, we make a special pleading that access to justice is properly recognised as a necessary pillar of a fair and just society.

‘The improved funding that has been available in the last two years cannot now be reversed without causing irrevocable damage to this vital public service. The consequences of cuts are not only a failing system, but one that ultimately costs more—both in terms of money and in human terms. The government must commit to long-term planning and resourcing of the system.’

Issue: 8003 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
back-to-top-scroll