header-logo header-logo

11 April 2019
Categories: Legal News , Employment , Discrimination
printer mail-detail

Barristers back stronger parental rights

The Bar Council has backed extending redundancy protection for pregnant women and new parents to help bridge the gender pay gap.

It also said existing protections on pregnancy and maternity are not well understood by employers. To boost understanding, it suggested easily accessible information about employment rights be made available in clinics, hospitals and surgeries.

It also suggested employers could be given a responsibility to provide information to workers, and called for ACAS and the EHRC to update their guidance.

The Bar Council was responding to a government consultation on ‘Pregnancy and maternity discrimination’.

In its response, the Bar Council’s law reform committee stated the benefits were ‘likely to be increasing the diversity of the workplace, boosting the economic productivity of maternity returners, ensuring a better return on the investment in women at work who have children, reducing the attrition of skills and talent and overall reducing the gender pay gap in many instances. It would also ensure a greater understanding of rights and obligations, which would avoid misunderstandings, grievances and possibly also litigation, which would save time and costs for individuals and businesses alike’.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

JMW—Belinda Brooke

JMW—Belinda Brooke

Employment and people solutions offering boosted by partner hire

NEWS

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law
back-to-top-scroll