header-logo header-logo

Barristers consult on protest action

12 January 2022
Issue: 7962 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Criminal
printer mail-detail
The Criminal Bar Association (CBA) is polling its members on taking direct action or ‘as a minimum’ adopting a no returns policy should ministers fail to commit to increase fees
Practitioners have been asked to respond to a seven-day survey launched this week, on what increase they deem acceptable and what protest action they are prepared to take.

In December, Sir Christopher Bellamy’s Independent Review of Criminal Legal Aid recommended at least £135m extra per year be added to the budget to keep the criminal justice system functioning effectively. This would increase funding for solicitors and barristers by 15% above present levels, amounting to an extra £35m in fees.

The Ministry of Justice said it would issue its full response to the review and consultation by the end of March 2022.

In his ‘Monday Message’ this week, however, CBA chair Jo Sidhu QC says he ‘made it abundantly clear’ at a meeting on 15 December with the under-secretary of state for justice that it would be ‘utterly unacceptable for the Criminal Bar to wait another 15 weeks to hear the government’s verdict’ with any ensuing consultation meaning the outcome would not be known until the end of June.

Sidhu described the proposed ‘modest increase’ as ‘an insultingly small improvement in annual incomes’ that would do nothing to discourage hundreds more colleagues from leaving legal aid work.

The CBA survey asks whether the respondent agrees: it is unreasonable for the government to delay its response until the end of March; that unless the government undertakes to complete both its response and consultation by the end of March, criminal barristers should ‘take action to include, as a minimum, no returns’; an increase of £35m (15%) is insufficient; and criminal barristers should take action unless the government commits to a ‘substantial increase’.

Issue: 7962 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll