header-logo header-logo

Debarring orders: Be careful what you wish for?

05 December 2025 / Mary Young
Issue: 8142 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Fraud
printer mail-detail
237724
Debarment: shortcut to judgment or simply a trial management tool? Mary Young reports
  • Debarment can be used to accelerate determination of a claim at a lower cost to the claimant, and it can be extremely effective. But in some circumstances, the issues relating to the extent of a defendant’s participation in a trial may be more nuanced.
  • Even where a defendant has been debarred, residual discretion and the exercise of the court’s judicial function tend to lead to a limited degree of participation being allowed by the court.

‘A debarring order is an important sanction available to the court in the exercise of its case management powers, and an important method of ensuring that the court’s case management orders are respected.’ So summarised Mr Edwin Johnson KC, sitting as a deputy judge in Times Travel (UK) Ltd v Pakistan International Airlines Corp [2019] EWHC 3732 (Ch).

Obtaining an unless order with a view to debarring a defendant from defending the claim is a tactic employed, when

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DAC Beachcroft—Ben Daniels

DAC Beachcroft—Ben Daniels

Firm elects new senior partner to lead next phase of growth

Taylor Rose—Amarjit Ryatt

Taylor Rose—Amarjit Ryatt

Partner appointed head of family and divorce

Browne Jacobson—Adam Berry & Adam Culy

Browne Jacobson—Adam Berry & Adam Culy

Financial and professional risks team expand with dual partner hire

NEWS
The High Court’s decision in Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys has thrown the careers of experienced CILEX litigators into jeopardy, warns Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers in NLJ this week
Sir Brian Leveson’s claim that there is ‘no right to jury trial’ erects a constitutional straw man, argues Professor Graham Zellick KC in NLJ this week. He argues that Leveson dismantles a position almost no-one truly holds, and thereby obscures the deeper issue: the jury’s place within the UK’s constitutional tradition
Why have private prosecutions surged despite limited data? Niall Hearty of Rahman Ravelli explores their rise in this week's NLJ 
The public law team at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer surveys significant recent human rights and judicial review rulings in this week's NLJ
In this week's NLJ, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley examines how debarring orders, while attractive to claimants seeking swift resolution, can complicate trials—most notably in fraud cases requiring ‘particularly cogent’ proof
back-to-top-scroll