header-logo header-logo

05 December 2025 / Mary Young
Issue: 8142 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Fraud
printer mail-detail

Debarring orders: Be careful what you wish for?

237724
Debarment: shortcut to judgment or simply a trial management tool? Mary Young reports
  • Debarment can be used to accelerate determination of a claim at a lower cost to the claimant, and it can be extremely effective. But in some circumstances, the issues relating to the extent of a defendant’s participation in a trial may be more nuanced.
  • Even where a defendant has been debarred, residual discretion and the exercise of the court’s judicial function tend to lead to a limited degree of participation being allowed by the court.

‘A debarring order is an important sanction available to the court in the exercise of its case management powers, and an important method of ensuring that the court’s case management orders are respected.’ So summarised Mr Edwin Johnson KC, sitting as a deputy judge in Times Travel (UK) Ltd v Pakistan International Airlines Corp [2019] EWHC 3732 (Ch).

Obtaining an unless order with a view to debarring a defendant from defending the claim is a tactic employed, when

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll