header-logo header-logo

05 December 2025 / Mary Young
Issue: 8142 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Fraud
printer mail-detail

Debarring orders: Be careful what you wish for?

237724
Debarment: shortcut to judgment or simply a trial management tool? Mary Young reports
  • Debarment can be used to accelerate determination of a claim at a lower cost to the claimant, and it can be extremely effective. But in some circumstances, the issues relating to the extent of a defendant’s participation in a trial may be more nuanced.
  • Even where a defendant has been debarred, residual discretion and the exercise of the court’s judicial function tend to lead to a limited degree of participation being allowed by the court.

‘A debarring order is an important sanction available to the court in the exercise of its case management powers, and an important method of ensuring that the court’s case management orders are respected.’ So summarised Mr Edwin Johnson KC, sitting as a deputy judge in Times Travel (UK) Ltd v Pakistan International Airlines Corp [2019] EWHC 3732 (Ch).

Obtaining an unless order with a view to debarring a defendant from defending the claim is a tactic employed, when

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
back-to-top-scroll