header-logo header-logo

Becoming anti-social

22 January 2016 / Michael Salter , Chris Bryden
Issue: 7683 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail
nlj_7683_brydensalter-

Chris Bryden & Michael Salter consider the risk to professionals of social media misuse

The impact of social media misuse has been felt with increasing effect in employment relationships as social media has continued to insinuate itself into the workplace. There is a burgeoning body of case law emanating from employment tribunals as well as civil courts in relation to claims of wrongful dismissal (as well as many other areas of law). However, what is often overlooked by commentators when analysing such cases, and by human resources departments when giving advice to their organisations, are the added restrictions and consequences for social media misuse that may be imposed on professional employees by their respective codes of conduct and regulatory bodies. Many such regulatory bodies have, at their heart, values which often are diametrically opposed to the ethos of social media interaction, for good reason. For example, the provision of legal advice by regulated professionals is guarded by rules of privilege, confidentiality, form and process; whereas social media champions the mass and instantaneous communication between the poster

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll