header-logo header-logo

22 January 2016 / Michael Salter , Chris Bryden
Issue: 7683 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Becoming anti-social

nlj_7683_brydensalter-

Chris Bryden & Michael Salter consider the risk to professionals of social media misuse

The impact of social media misuse has been felt with increasing effect in employment relationships as social media has continued to insinuate itself into the workplace. There is a burgeoning body of case law emanating from employment tribunals as well as civil courts in relation to claims of wrongful dismissal (as well as many other areas of law). However, what is often overlooked by commentators when analysing such cases, and by human resources departments when giving advice to their organisations, are the added restrictions and consequences for social media misuse that may be imposed on professional employees by their respective codes of conduct and regulatory bodies. Many such regulatory bodies have, at their heart, values which often are diametrically opposed to the ethos of social media interaction, for good reason. For example, the provision of legal advice by regulated professionals is guarded by rules of privilege, confidentiality, form and process; whereas social media champions the mass and instantaneous communication between the poster

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Winckworth Sherwood—Charlotte Coleman & Qaisar Sheikh

Winckworth Sherwood—Charlotte Coleman & Qaisar Sheikh

Two promoted to partner in property litigation and education teams

Dorsey & Whitney LLP—Peter Knust

Dorsey & Whitney LLP—Peter Knust

Cross-border finance and restructuring specialist joins as of counsel in London

Powell Gilbert—Callum Beamish-Lacey

Powell Gilbert—Callum Beamish-Lacey

IP firm promotes litigator to partnership

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll